CVE-2025-14184VulnerabilityPublished 7 Dec 2025Updated 8 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-14184: SGAI Space1 NAS N1211DS · Command Injection

Affects SGAI Space1 NAS N1211DSSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 2.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 82% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 7 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SGAI Space1 NAS N1211DS	Affected =1.0.915	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediately restrict network access to the affected NAS devices by implementing strict firewall rules and network segmentation to isolate them from untrusted networks, especially the internet. 2. Disable or restrict access to the /cgi-bin/JSONAPI interface if possible, or limit it to trusted internal IP addresses only. 3. Monitor network traffic and device logs for unusual or unauthorized commands or access attempts targeting the JSONAPI endpoint. 4. Employ intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) tuned to detect command injection patterns or anomalous API usage. 5. If feasible, replace or upgrade affected NAS devices to models or firmware versions not impacted by this vulnerability. 6. Maintain regular backups of critical data stored on the NAS, ensuring backups are stored offline or on separate systems to prevent compromise. 7. Engage with the vendor for updates or patches and apply them promptly once available. 8. Educate IT staff about this vulnerability and ensure incident response plans include steps for potential NAS compromise scenarios.

Description

A vulnerability was determined in SGAI Space1 NAS N1211DS up to 1.0.915. Impacted is the function RENAME_FILE/OPERATE_FILE/NGNIX_UPLOAD of the file /cgi-bin/JSONAPI of the component gsaiagent. This manipulation causes command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations, exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized command execution on critical NAS devices, resulting in data theft, data manipulation, or service disruption. Given that NAS devices often store sensitive corporate data, intellectual property, or backups, compromise could severely impact confidentiality and integrity. Availability could also be affected if attackers delete or corrupt stored files or disrupt NAS operations. The lack of vendor response and patches increases the risk exposure period. Organizations relying on SGAI Space1 NAS N1211DS for centralized storage or backup services are particularly vulnerable if these devices are accessible from untrusted networks. This could affect sectors such as finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and government agencies that use NAS for critical data storage and sharing. The medium severity rating indicates a moderate risk, but the ease of remote exploitation without authentication elevates the threat level in practice.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 14 Dec 2025, 06:00 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats