CVE-2025-14229VulnerabilityPublished 8 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-14229: SourceCodester Inventory Management System · CSV Injection

Affects SourceCodester Inventory Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 28% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
SourceCodester Inventory Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-14229, organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization on all data fields that are exported to CSV files, ensuring that any leading characters that could be interpreted as formulas (such as '=', '+', '-', '@') are either escaped or prefixed with a single quote to neutralize formula execution. Since no official patches are available, manual code review and modification of the SVC Report Export function to sanitize inputs is critical. Additionally, organizations should educate users to open CSV files in text editors or spreadsheet applications with formula execution disabled when possible. Employing endpoint security controls to detect suspicious macro or formula execution can help reduce risk. Limiting elevated privileges on the inventory management system reduces the attack surface. Monitoring logs for unusual export activity and restricting report export functionality to trusted users can further reduce exposure. Finally, organizations should engage with SourceCodester for updates or patches and consider alternative inventory management solutions if remediation is delayed.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in SourceCodester Inventory Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the component SVC Report Export. Such manipulation leads to csv injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, the CSV Injection vulnerability poses a risk of indirect compromise through trusted report files. If attackers can inject malicious formulas into exported CSV reports, users opening these files in spreadsheet applications may inadvertently execute harmful code. This can lead to data theft, unauthorized system access, or lateral movement within networks. The impact is particularly concerning for organizations handling sensitive inventory or supply chain data, as manipulation or exposure of such data can disrupt operations and damage reputations. Since exploitation requires elevated privileges on the source system, insider threats or compromised accounts could facilitate attacks. The medium severity rating reflects moderate impact but significant risk if exploited in environments with high reliance on CSV exports. European companies in manufacturing, retail, and logistics sectors using SourceCodester’s system may face operational disruptions and compliance risks under GDPR if personal or sensitive data is exposed. The absence of known exploits currently limits immediate widespread impact, but public disclosure increases the likelihood of future attacks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 8 Dec 2025, 11:23 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats