CVE-2025-14538VulnerabilityPublished 11 Dec 2025Updated 12 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-14538: yangshare warehouseManager 仓库管理系统 · Cross Site Scripting

Affects yangshare warehouseManager 仓库管理系统Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubyangshare/warehouseManager`pkg:github/yangshare/warehouseManager`Other threats	Affected =1.1.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Implement strict input validation on the 'Name' parameter in the addCustomer function, ensuring only expected characters are accepted (e.g., alphanumeric and limited special characters). 2. Apply proper output encoding/escaping for all user-supplied data rendered in the web interface to prevent script execution. 3. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in the browser. 4. Restrict access to the warehouseManager application to trusted internal networks or VPNs to reduce exposure. 5. Educate users about phishing risks and suspicious links to minimize successful user interaction exploitation. 6. Monitor web application logs for unusual input patterns or repeated attempts to inject scripts. 7. Engage with yangshare for timely patch updates and apply them promptly once available. 8. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block XSS payloads targeting the vulnerable parameter. 9. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on input validation and XSS vulnerabilities.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in yangshare warehouseManager 仓库管理系统 1.1.0. This affects the function addCustomer of the file CustomerManageHandler.java. Such manipulation of the argument Name leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk, particularly for those in logistics, warehousing, and supply chain management sectors using yangshare warehouseManager 1.1.0. Successful exploitation could lead to theft of user credentials, session hijacking, or unauthorized actions within the application, compromising customer data and operational integrity. This could result in financial losses, reputational damage, and regulatory non-compliance under GDPR if personal data is exposed. The attack vector being remote and requiring no authentication increases the attack surface, especially if the application is internet-facing. However, the need for user interaction somewhat limits automated exploitation. Still, phishing campaigns or social engineering could facilitate attacks. The lack of a patch means organizations must rely on mitigations until an official fix is released. Disruption to warehouse operations could also indirectly affect supply chains, impacting broader business continuity.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…