CVE-2025-14547: silabs.com Simplicity SDK · Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)
Affects silabs.com Simplicity SDKSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.3 Low.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 25% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| silabs.comSimplicity SDK | Affected
| Fixed in– |
| silabs.comGecko SDK | Affected
| Fixed in– |
GitHubSiSDKpkg:github/SiSDKOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in– |
GitHubGSDKpkg:github/GSDKOther threats | Affected
| Fixed in– |
Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.
AI-suggested
To mitigate CVE-2025-14547, organizations should: 1) Monitor Silicon Labs' official channels for patches or updates addressing the integer underflow in the Simplicity SDK and apply them promptly once available. 2) Implement additional input validation and bounds checking on ZKP data before processing to prevent malformed inputs from triggering underflows. 3) Employ runtime monitoring and anomaly detection on devices to identify unexpected crashes or hard faults related to cryptographic operations. 4) Where feasible, isolate critical cryptographic functions to limit the impact of potential DoS conditions. 5) Conduct thorough code reviews and static analysis on custom integrations of the SDK to detect similar integer handling issues. 6) Engage with Silicon Labs support for guidance on interim workarounds or configuration changes that may reduce exposure. 7) Maintain robust device recovery mechanisms to minimize downtime in case of faults. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on proactive validation, monitoring, and vendor engagement specific to the affected SDK and cryptographic context.
Description
An integer underflow vulnerability is present in Silicon Lab’s implementation of PSA Crypto and SE Manager EC-JPAKE APIs during ZKP parsing. Triggering the underflow can lead to a hard fault, causing a temporary denial of service.