CVE-2025-14777: Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name in Red Hat Red Hat Build of Keycloak
A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-14777 is a vulnerability identified in the Red Hat Build of Keycloak, specifically within the admin API endpoints responsible for managing authorization resources. The affected components are ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService, which handle resource management and permission tickets respectively. The root cause is a broken access control mechanism: the system performs authorization checks against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend operations that find or delete resources rely solely on the resourceId without verifying the client association. This discrepancy enables an authenticated attacker who has fine-grained admin permissions scoped to one client (Client A) to manipulate resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID from Client B. The vulnerability is classified as an IDOR, allowing unauthorized resource modification or deletion across client boundaries. Exploitation requires authenticated access with elevated privileges but does not require user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 score of 6.0 reflects a network attack vector with low attack complexity, requiring high privileges, no user interaction, and resulting in low confidentiality impact but high integrity impact and low availability impact. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the flaw poses a significant risk in multi-tenant environments where multiple clients share the same Keycloak realm. The vulnerability could lead to unauthorized deletion or modification of authorization resources, potentially disrupting access control policies and causing privilege escalation or denial of service for affected clients.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-14777 is unauthorized modification or deletion of authorization resources across client boundaries within the same Keycloak realm. This can compromise the integrity of access control configurations, leading to privilege escalation, unauthorized access, or denial of service for affected clients. Organizations relying on Keycloak for identity and access management in multi-tenant or multi-client environments are at risk of cross-client interference, which could disrupt business operations, cause data loss, or expose sensitive resources. Although confidentiality impact is limited, the high integrity impact can undermine trust in the authentication and authorization infrastructure. The vulnerability requires authenticated access with elevated permissions, so insider threats or compromised admin accounts pose a significant risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests limited immediate threat, but the vulnerability's nature makes it a high priority for remediation to prevent potential targeted attacks or misuse by malicious insiders.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-14777, organizations should apply vendor-provided patches or updates as soon as they become available from Red Hat. In the absence of patches, administrators should audit and restrict fine-grained admin permissions to the minimum necessary scope, avoiding broad privileges that span multiple clients. Implement strict monitoring and logging of admin API usage to detect anomalous resource modifications or deletions. Consider isolating clients into separate Keycloak realms to reduce cross-client attack surface. Review and enhance access control checks in custom Keycloak extensions or integrations to ensure resource ownership validation aligns with authorization checks. Employ network segmentation and strong authentication mechanisms to limit access to Keycloak admin APIs. Regularly review and rotate admin credentials to reduce risk from compromised accounts. Finally, conduct penetration testing and code reviews focused on access control enforcement within Keycloak deployments to identify similar issues proactively.
Affected Countries
United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, India, Japan, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Netherlands, South Korea
CVE-2025-14777: Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name in Red Hat Red Hat Build of Keycloak
Description
A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-14777 is a vulnerability identified in the Red Hat Build of Keycloak, specifically within the admin API endpoints responsible for managing authorization resources. The affected components are ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService, which handle resource management and permission tickets respectively. The root cause is a broken access control mechanism: the system performs authorization checks against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend operations that find or delete resources rely solely on the resourceId without verifying the client association. This discrepancy enables an authenticated attacker who has fine-grained admin permissions scoped to one client (Client A) to manipulate resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID from Client B. The vulnerability is classified as an IDOR, allowing unauthorized resource modification or deletion across client boundaries. Exploitation requires authenticated access with elevated privileges but does not require user interaction. The CVSS v3.1 score of 6.0 reflects a network attack vector with low attack complexity, requiring high privileges, no user interaction, and resulting in low confidentiality impact but high integrity impact and low availability impact. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the flaw poses a significant risk in multi-tenant environments where multiple clients share the same Keycloak realm. The vulnerability could lead to unauthorized deletion or modification of authorization resources, potentially disrupting access control policies and causing privilege escalation or denial of service for affected clients.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2025-14777 is unauthorized modification or deletion of authorization resources across client boundaries within the same Keycloak realm. This can compromise the integrity of access control configurations, leading to privilege escalation, unauthorized access, or denial of service for affected clients. Organizations relying on Keycloak for identity and access management in multi-tenant or multi-client environments are at risk of cross-client interference, which could disrupt business operations, cause data loss, or expose sensitive resources. Although confidentiality impact is limited, the high integrity impact can undermine trust in the authentication and authorization infrastructure. The vulnerability requires authenticated access with elevated permissions, so insider threats or compromised admin accounts pose a significant risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests limited immediate threat, but the vulnerability's nature makes it a high priority for remediation to prevent potential targeted attacks or misuse by malicious insiders.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-14777, organizations should apply vendor-provided patches or updates as soon as they become available from Red Hat. In the absence of patches, administrators should audit and restrict fine-grained admin permissions to the minimum necessary scope, avoiding broad privileges that span multiple clients. Implement strict monitoring and logging of admin API usage to detect anomalous resource modifications or deletions. Consider isolating clients into separate Keycloak realms to reduce cross-client attack surface. Review and enhance access control checks in custom Keycloak extensions or integrations to ensure resource ownership validation aligns with authorization checks. Employ network segmentation and strong authentication mechanisms to limit access to Keycloak admin APIs. Regularly review and rotate admin credentials to reduce risk from compromised accounts. Finally, conduct penetration testing and code reviews focused on access control enforcement within Keycloak deployments to identify similar issues proactively.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-16T04:56:14.486Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6940ec04a4f72ecfcafbad2a
Added to database: 12/16/2025, 5:20:04 AM
Last enriched: 2/27/2026, 11:33:45 AM
Last updated: 3/24/2026, 4:23:16 AM
Views: 412
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.