CVE-2025-14833VulnerabilityPublished 17 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-14833: code-projects Online Appointment Booking System · SQL Injection

Affects code-projects Online Appointment Booking SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 17 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
code-projects Online Appointment Booking System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately audit their deployment of the code-projects Online Appointment Booking System to identify if version 1.0 is in use. If so, restrict network access to the /admin/deletemanagerclinic.php endpoint using firewalls or web application firewalls (WAFs) to limit exposure to trusted IPs only. Implement input validation and sanitization at the application level, ensuring the 'clinic' parameter is strictly validated against expected formats and lengths. Where possible, modify the source code to use parameterized queries or prepared statements to eliminate SQL injection risks. Monitor logs for suspicious activities targeting the vulnerable endpoint and set up alerts for anomalous SQL errors or injection patterns. Until an official patch is released, consider isolating the booking system in a segmented network zone to reduce lateral movement risk. Conduct regular backups of the database and test restoration procedures to mitigate data loss from potential attacks. Engage with the vendor or community to obtain patches or updates and apply them promptly once available. Finally, raise user awareness among administrators about the risks and signs of exploitation attempts.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in code-projects Online Appointment Booking System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/deletemanagerclinic.php. Performing manipulation of the argument clinic results in sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those in healthcare, wellness, or service industries relying on the code-projects Online Appointment Booking System, this vulnerability poses a significant risk. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive client or patient data, violating GDPR and other data protection regulations, resulting in legal and financial penalties. Data integrity could be compromised, causing incorrect appointment records or deletion of critical scheduling information, disrupting operations and service delivery. Availability impacts may arise if attackers execute destructive SQL commands, leading to denial of service. The remote, unauthenticated nature of the vulnerability increases the attack surface, particularly for organizations exposing the booking system's admin interface to the internet. This could facilitate lateral movement or further compromise if attackers gain database access. The reputational damage from data breaches or service outages could be severe, especially for healthcare providers. Additionally, the lack of patches means organizations must act swiftly to implement mitigations. Overall, the vulnerability threatens confidentiality, integrity, and availability, with compliance and operational risks amplified in the European regulatory and business context.

Summary

CVE-2025-14833 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in the code-projects Online Appointment Booking System version 1.0, specifically within the /admin/deletemanagerclinic.php script. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization of the 'clinic' parameter, which is directly used in SQL queries without adequate validation or parameterization. This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to remotely inject malicious SQL code, potentially manipulating the backend database. The attack vector is network-based with no required privileges or user interaction, making exploitation straightforward once the system is accessible. The impact includes unauthorized data disclosure, modification, or deletion, which could compromise patient or client data and disrupt appointment scheduling services. Although no confirmed exploits are reported in the wild, the public availability of exploit code increases the likelihood of attacks. The vulnerability affects only version 1.0 of the product, and no official patches have been published yet. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 6.9 reflects medium severity, considering the ease of exploitation and potential impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The lack of scope change indicates the attack affects only the vulnerable component without extending to other system parts. This vulnerability highlights the critical need for secure coding practices in web applications handling sensitive scheduling and personal data.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 25 Dec 2025, 00:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats