CVE-2025-14846: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in socialchampio SocialChamp with WordPress
The SocialChamp with WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the wpsc_settings_tab_menu function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-14846 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SocialChamp with WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to and including 1.3.3. The root cause is the absence of nonce validation in the wpsc_settings_tab_menu function, which is responsible for handling plugin settings. Nonce tokens are security measures used in WordPress to ensure that requests are intentional and originate from legitimate users. Without this validation, attackers can craft malicious URLs or forms that, when visited or submitted by an authenticated administrator, cause unintended changes to the plugin’s configuration. Since the vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but relies on tricking an admin user into clicking a link (user interaction required), it leverages social engineering tactics. The impact is limited to integrity as attackers can modify settings but cannot directly access or leak sensitive data (confidentiality) or disrupt service availability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) confirms network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction needed, unchanged scope, no confidentiality or availability impact, and limited integrity impact. No patches or known exploits are currently reported, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly to avoid exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to the integrity of WordPress sites using the SocialChamp plugin. Attackers could alter plugin settings, potentially enabling further malicious activities such as redirecting social media posts, injecting malicious content, or disrupting social media management workflows. While it does not directly compromise data confidentiality or site availability, unauthorized configuration changes can undermine trust and operational effectiveness. Organizations relying on SocialChamp for social media automation or marketing may face reputational damage or operational disruptions if attackers exploit this flaw. Since the attack requires tricking an administrator, organizations with less security-aware staff or lacking multi-factor authentication for admin accounts are at higher risk. The vulnerability’s medium severity suggests it should be addressed alongside other prioritized security issues, especially in sectors with high regulatory scrutiny such as finance, healthcare, and government within Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-14846, European organizations should: 1) Immediately update the SocialChamp plugin to a patched version once available; if no patch exists, consider temporarily disabling the plugin or restricting access to its settings page. 2) Implement strict administrative access controls, including enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for WordPress admin accounts to reduce the risk of successful social engineering. 3) Educate administrators about phishing and social engineering risks to prevent inadvertent clicks on malicious links. 4) Use Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with CSRF protection rules to detect and block suspicious requests targeting plugin settings endpoints. 5) Monitor WordPress logs for unusual POST requests or changes to plugin settings that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) Limit the number of users with administrative privileges and regularly review user roles to minimize attack surface. 7) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce the risk of malicious content injection that could facilitate CSRF attacks. These targeted steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on administrative behavior, access controls, and monitoring specific to this plugin’s vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Belgium, Poland
CVE-2025-14846: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in socialchampio SocialChamp with WordPress
Description
The SocialChamp with WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the wpsc_settings_tab_menu function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-14846 identifies a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the SocialChamp with WordPress plugin, affecting all versions up to and including 1.3.3. The root cause is the absence of nonce validation in the wpsc_settings_tab_menu function, which is responsible for handling plugin settings. Nonce tokens are security measures used in WordPress to ensure that requests are intentional and originate from legitimate users. Without this validation, attackers can craft malicious URLs or forms that, when visited or submitted by an authenticated administrator, cause unintended changes to the plugin’s configuration. Since the vulnerability does not require the attacker to be authenticated but relies on tricking an admin user into clicking a link (user interaction required), it leverages social engineering tactics. The impact is limited to integrity as attackers can modify settings but cannot directly access or leak sensitive data (confidentiality) or disrupt service availability. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) confirms network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction needed, unchanged scope, no confidentiality or availability impact, and limited integrity impact. No patches or known exploits are currently reported, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and should be addressed promptly to avoid exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to the integrity of WordPress sites using the SocialChamp plugin. Attackers could alter plugin settings, potentially enabling further malicious activities such as redirecting social media posts, injecting malicious content, or disrupting social media management workflows. While it does not directly compromise data confidentiality or site availability, unauthorized configuration changes can undermine trust and operational effectiveness. Organizations relying on SocialChamp for social media automation or marketing may face reputational damage or operational disruptions if attackers exploit this flaw. Since the attack requires tricking an administrator, organizations with less security-aware staff or lacking multi-factor authentication for admin accounts are at higher risk. The vulnerability’s medium severity suggests it should be addressed alongside other prioritized security issues, especially in sectors with high regulatory scrutiny such as finance, healthcare, and government within Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2025-14846, European organizations should: 1) Immediately update the SocialChamp plugin to a patched version once available; if no patch exists, consider temporarily disabling the plugin or restricting access to its settings page. 2) Implement strict administrative access controls, including enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) for WordPress admin accounts to reduce the risk of successful social engineering. 3) Educate administrators about phishing and social engineering risks to prevent inadvertent clicks on malicious links. 4) Use Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with CSRF protection rules to detect and block suspicious requests targeting plugin settings endpoints. 5) Monitor WordPress logs for unusual POST requests or changes to plugin settings that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) Limit the number of users with administrative privileges and regularly review user roles to minimize attack surface. 7) Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce the risk of malicious content injection that could facilitate CSRF attacks. These targeted steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on administrative behavior, access controls, and monitoring specific to this plugin’s vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- Wordfence
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-17T18:55:54.282Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69673f948330e06716b84f80
Added to database: 1/14/2026, 7:02:44 AM
Last enriched: 1/14/2026, 7:19:47 AM
Last updated: 1/14/2026, 3:50:36 PM
Views: 10
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14242: Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
MediumCVE-2026-22820: CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition in akinloluwami outray
MediumCVE-2026-22240: CWE-312 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in Bluspark Global BLUVOYIX
CriticalCVE-2026-22239: CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in Bluspark Global BLUVOYIX
CriticalCVE-2026-22238: CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function in Bluspark Global BLUVOYIX
CriticalActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.