CVE-2025-14897VulnerabilityPublished 18 Dec 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-14897: CodeAstro Real Estate Management System · SQL Injection

Affects CodeAstro Real Estate Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 18 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
CodeAstro Real Estate Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Apply official patches from CodeAstro as soon as they are released to address the vulnerability directly. 2. Until patches are available, restrict access to the /admin/useragentdelete.php endpoint strictly to trusted administrators via network segmentation, VPNs, or IP whitelisting. 3. Implement rigorous input validation and parameterized queries or prepared statements in the affected code to prevent SQL injection. 4. Conduct regular audits of database logs to detect suspicious queries or anomalous activities indicative of exploitation attempts. 5. Enforce strong authentication mechanisms and monitor for compromised credentials to prevent unauthorized administrative access. 6. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block SQL injection patterns targeting the vulnerable endpoint. 7. Educate administrators on security best practices and ensure timely application of security updates. 8. Develop and test incident response plans specific to database compromise scenarios to minimize impact if exploitation occurs.

Description

A vulnerability was identified in CodeAstro Real Estate Management System 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/useragentdelete.php of the component Administrator Endpoint. The manipulation leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Impact

The SQL injection vulnerability allows attackers with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the backend database. This can lead to unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data such as client information, property details, and transaction records, compromising confidentiality. Attackers may also alter or delete data, impacting data integrity and potentially disrupting business operations or causing financial losses. Availability could be affected if malicious queries degrade database performance or cause crashes. Since the vulnerability requires high privileges, the initial compromise vector might be through credential theft or insider threats, but once exploited, it can facilitate lateral movement or privilege escalation within the system. Organizations using the affected software risk reputational damage, regulatory penalties for data breaches, and operational downtime. The public availability of exploits increases the likelihood of targeted attacks, especially against real estate firms handling valuable personal and financial data.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 23:04 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats