VulnerabilityPublished 21 Dec 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-14991: Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System · Cross-site Scripting

Affects Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 14% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 21 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should first check for any official patches or updates from Campcodes and apply them promptly once available. In the absence of patches, implement strict input validation and output encoding on the fromdate parameter to neutralize any injected scripts. Employ a web application firewall (WAF) with rules designed to detect and block XSS payloads targeting this parameter. Restrict access to the /admin directory to trusted IP addresses or VPN users to reduce exposure. Educate administrators and users to avoid clicking on suspicious links or URLs that could trigger the XSS exploit. Regularly audit and monitor web server logs for unusual requests or attempts to exploit the fromdate parameter. Consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts in the browser. Finally, conduct security awareness training for staff to recognize phishing or social engineering attempts that could leverage this vulnerability.

Description

A weakness has been identified in Campcodes Complete Online Beauty Parlor Management System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /admin/bwdates-reports-details.php. Executing a manipulation of the argument fromdate can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the confidentiality and integrity of user sessions within the affected management system. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary scripts in the context of authenticated users, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions within the application. This could disrupt business operations, lead to data leakage, or damage customer trust. Since the system is used by beauty parlors, which may store sensitive customer information such as contact details and appointment histories, the exposure of such data could have privacy implications. The remote attack vector and public availability of exploit code increase the likelihood of targeted attacks, especially against smaller businesses that may lack robust cybersecurity defenses. However, the requirement for user interaction and administrative privileges limits the scope somewhat, reducing the risk of automated widespread exploitation. Overall, the vulnerability could facilitate targeted attacks against businesses using this software, potentially leading to reputational damage and operational disruptions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 23:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats