CVE-2025-15049VulnerabilityPublished 23 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-15049: code-projects Online Farm System · SQL Injection

Affects code-projects Online Farm SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 32% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 23 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
code-projects Online Farm System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately audit their use of the Online Farm System to identify installations of version 1.0. 2) Refactor database queries to use parameterized statements or prepared queries to prevent injection. 3) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with SQL injection detection rules to block malicious requests targeting this endpoint. 4) Monitor database logs and application logs for unusual query patterns or errors indicative of injection attempts. 5) Restrict network access to the application backend where possible, limiting exposure to trusted IPs. 6) Plan for an upgrade to a patched or newer version of the software once available. 7) Conduct security awareness training for IT staff to recognize and respond to exploitation attempts. 8) Regularly back up databases to enable recovery in case of data tampering or loss.

Description

CVE-2025-15049 is a medium-severity SQL injection vulnerability found in version 1.0 of the code-projects Online Farm System, specifically in the /addProduct.php file. The flaw arises from improper sanitization of the 'Username' parameter, allowing remote attackers to inject malicious SQL code without authentication or user interaction. Exploitation could lead to partial compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the backend database. Although no known exploits are currently active in the wild, a public exploit exists, increasing the risk of future attacks. This vulnerability primarily affects organizations using this specific online farm management software. European agricultural businesses and related service providers using this system are at risk, especially in countries with higher adoption of such platforms. Mitigation requires immediate input validation, parameterized queries, and monitoring for suspicious database activity. Given the medium CVSS score of 6.

Impact

For European organizations using the Online Farm System 1.0, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive agricultural data, including product inventories, user information, and operational details. Attackers could manipulate or delete data, causing operational disruptions and financial losses. Confidentiality breaches could expose proprietary farming methods or customer data, potentially violating GDPR regulations and resulting in legal penalties. Integrity compromises could lead to incorrect product listings or orders, damaging business reputation and trust. Availability impacts might disrupt farm management operations, affecting supply chains and productivity. Given the agricultural sector's increasing reliance on digital tools, such disruptions could have cascading effects on food production and distribution. The presence of a public exploit increases the likelihood of opportunistic attacks, especially against smaller or less-secure farms that may not have robust cybersecurity measures.

Summary

CVE-2025-15049 is a SQL injection vulnerability identified in the Online Farm System version 1.0 developed by code-projects. The vulnerability exists in the /addProduct.php endpoint, where the 'Username' parameter is not properly sanitized or validated before being used in SQL queries. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially manipulating the database. The vulnerability does not require any privileges or user interaction, making it easier to exploit remotely. The CVSS 4.0 score of 6.9 reflects a medium severity, indicating a significant but not critical risk. The impact includes unauthorized data disclosure, data modification, or deletion, and potential disruption of service. No patches or fixes are currently listed, and while no active exploitation has been reported, a public exploit is available, increasing the risk of exploitation. The vulnerability affects only version 1.0 of the product, limiting its scope to organizations still running this outdated version. The lack of authentication and user interaction requirements combined with remote exploitability makes this a notable threat to affected systems.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 31 Dec 2025, 00:28 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats