CVE-2025-15083: On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control in TOZED ZLT M30s
A vulnerability was determined in TOZED ZLT M30s up to 1.47. The affected element is an unknown function of the component UART Interface. Executing manipulation can lead to on-chip debug and test interface with improper access control. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-15083 identifies a vulnerability in the TOZED ZLT M30s series (all versions up to 1.47) related to improper access control on the on-chip debug and test interface accessible through the UART interface. This flaw allows an attacker with physical access to the device to manipulate the debug interface, potentially bypassing security controls and gaining low-level hardware access. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction but is difficult to exploit due to the need for physical proximity and technical expertise. The vulnerability was publicly disclosed on December 25, 2025, with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 1.0, indicating low severity primarily because of the attack vector (physical access) and high attack complexity. The vendor TOZED has not responded to disclosure attempts, and no patches or mitigations have been released. The lack of vendor response and public exploit code means the threat is currently theoretical but could be leveraged in targeted attacks against devices in sensitive environments. The vulnerability impacts device integrity and potentially confidentiality if debug interfaces expose sensitive information. The affected devices are likely embedded or IoT systems, where on-chip debug interfaces are common for development and testing but should be secured in production. The absence of network-based attack vectors limits the scope but does not eliminate risk in environments where physical device access is possible.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact is primarily on embedded systems or industrial devices using TOZED ZLT M30s components. Exploitation could allow attackers to manipulate device firmware or extract sensitive information via debug interfaces, potentially compromising device integrity and confidentiality. This could affect critical infrastructure sectors such as manufacturing, energy, and transportation where embedded devices are prevalent. The requirement for physical access limits widespread exploitation but raises concerns for environments with insufficient physical security controls. The lack of vendor patches increases risk over time, especially if attackers develop reliable exploit techniques. Compromise of these devices could lead to operational disruptions, data leakage, or serve as a foothold for further attacks within industrial control systems. However, the low CVSS score and high complexity reduce the likelihood of mass exploitation, making this more relevant for targeted attacks against high-value assets.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Enforce strict physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to devices containing TOZED ZLT M30s components, including locked cabinets and surveillance. 2. Disable or restrict access to on-chip debug and test interfaces in production environments where possible, or implement hardware-level protections such as fuses or secure boot mechanisms. 3. Monitor device firmware integrity regularly to detect unauthorized modifications that could indicate exploitation. 4. Segregate networks and limit connectivity of embedded devices to reduce attack surface. 5. Engage with TOZED or suppliers for updates or patches and track vulnerability disclosures for future remediation. 6. Conduct security audits of embedded systems to identify presence of vulnerable devices and plan phased replacement if necessary. 7. Train operational staff on risks associated with physical device access and implement strict access policies. 8. Consider deploying tamper-evident seals or sensors to detect physical intrusion attempts. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on physical security and embedded device hardening specific to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-15083: On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control in TOZED ZLT M30s
Description
A vulnerability was determined in TOZED ZLT M30s up to 1.47. The affected element is an unknown function of the component UART Interface. Executing manipulation can lead to on-chip debug and test interface with improper access control. The physical device can be targeted for the attack. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-15083 identifies a vulnerability in the TOZED ZLT M30s series (all versions up to 1.47) related to improper access control on the on-chip debug and test interface accessible through the UART interface. This flaw allows an attacker with physical access to the device to manipulate the debug interface, potentially bypassing security controls and gaining low-level hardware access. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction but is difficult to exploit due to the need for physical proximity and technical expertise. The vulnerability was publicly disclosed on December 25, 2025, with a CVSS 4.0 base score of 1.0, indicating low severity primarily because of the attack vector (physical access) and high attack complexity. The vendor TOZED has not responded to disclosure attempts, and no patches or mitigations have been released. The lack of vendor response and public exploit code means the threat is currently theoretical but could be leveraged in targeted attacks against devices in sensitive environments. The vulnerability impacts device integrity and potentially confidentiality if debug interfaces expose sensitive information. The affected devices are likely embedded or IoT systems, where on-chip debug interfaces are common for development and testing but should be secured in production. The absence of network-based attack vectors limits the scope but does not eliminate risk in environments where physical device access is possible.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact is primarily on embedded systems or industrial devices using TOZED ZLT M30s components. Exploitation could allow attackers to manipulate device firmware or extract sensitive information via debug interfaces, potentially compromising device integrity and confidentiality. This could affect critical infrastructure sectors such as manufacturing, energy, and transportation where embedded devices are prevalent. The requirement for physical access limits widespread exploitation but raises concerns for environments with insufficient physical security controls. The lack of vendor patches increases risk over time, especially if attackers develop reliable exploit techniques. Compromise of these devices could lead to operational disruptions, data leakage, or serve as a foothold for further attacks within industrial control systems. However, the low CVSS score and high complexity reduce the likelihood of mass exploitation, making this more relevant for targeted attacks against high-value assets.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Enforce strict physical security controls to prevent unauthorized access to devices containing TOZED ZLT M30s components, including locked cabinets and surveillance. 2. Disable or restrict access to on-chip debug and test interfaces in production environments where possible, or implement hardware-level protections such as fuses or secure boot mechanisms. 3. Monitor device firmware integrity regularly to detect unauthorized modifications that could indicate exploitation. 4. Segregate networks and limit connectivity of embedded devices to reduce attack surface. 5. Engage with TOZED or suppliers for updates or patches and track vulnerability disclosures for future remediation. 6. Conduct security audits of embedded systems to identify presence of vulnerable devices and plan phased replacement if necessary. 7. Train operational staff on risks associated with physical device access and implement strict access policies. 8. Consider deploying tamper-evident seals or sensors to detect physical intrusion attempts. These measures go beyond generic advice by focusing on physical security and embedded device hardening specific to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- VulDB
- Date Reserved
- 2025-12-25T09:36:38.360Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 694d7662f4aff2fc081e1f50
Added to database: 12/25/2025, 5:37:38 PM
Last enriched: 1/1/2026, 10:23:39 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 10:38:50 AM
Views: 59
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2082: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
MediumCVE-2026-2080: Command Injection in UTT HiPER 810
HighCVE-2026-2079: Improper Authorization in yeqifu warehouse
MediumCVE-2026-1675: CWE-1188 Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default in brstefanovic Advanced Country Blocker
MediumCVE-2026-1643: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in ariagle MP-Ukagaka
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.