Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-15105: Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key in getmaxun maxun

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-15105cvecve-2025-15105
Published: Sat Dec 27 2025 (12/27/2025, 09:02:06 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: getmaxun
Product: maxun

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in getmaxun maxun up to 0.0.28. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /getmaxun/maxun/blob/develop/server/src/routes/auth.ts. Performing manipulation of the argument api_key results in use of hard-coded cryptographic key . Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 01/03/2026, 22:58:56 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-15105 identifies a security vulnerability in the getmaxun maxun software product, specifically in versions 0.0.1 through 0.0.28. The flaw resides in the authentication route implemented in the file /getmaxun/maxun/blob/develop/server/src/routes/auth.ts, where a hard-coded cryptographic key is used. This improper use of a static key undermines cryptographic security by allowing attackers to manipulate the api_key argument remotely, potentially bypassing authentication or gaining unauthorized access. The vulnerability does not require any privileges or user interaction, but the attack complexity is high, indicating that exploitation demands significant skill or conditions. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.3 (medium severity), reflecting network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and limited confidentiality impact. The vendor was notified early but has not issued a patch or response, and no known exploits have been observed in the wild. Given the nature of the flaw, attackers could leverage the hard-coded key to decrypt or forge authentication tokens or API requests, compromising confidentiality of sensitive data or access controls. The vulnerability affects all listed versions up to 0.0.28, indicating a long-standing issue in the product's cryptographic implementation.

Potential Impact

For European organizations using getmaxun maxun, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized access due to compromised cryptographic protections in authentication mechanisms. Confidentiality of sensitive data or API communications could be breached if attackers successfully exploit the hard-coded key. Although the attack complexity is high and no widespread exploitation is currently known, the public availability of the exploit increases risk over time. Organizations relying on maxun for critical authentication or API security may face data leakage or unauthorized system access, potentially impacting compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The lack of vendor response and patches further exacerbates the risk, requiring organizations to implement compensating controls. The impact is primarily on confidentiality, with no direct integrity or availability effects reported. However, unauthorized access could lead to secondary impacts depending on the environment and data handled.

Mitigation Recommendations

Since no official patch or update is available from the vendor, European organizations should take the following specific steps: 1) Immediately audit all deployments of getmaxun maxun to identify affected versions (0.0.1 through 0.0.28). 2) Implement network-level access controls to restrict exposure of the vulnerable authentication endpoint, limiting it to trusted internal networks or VPNs. 3) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious manipulation of the api_key parameter. 4) Where possible, replace or override the hard-coded cryptographic key with a securely generated, unique key per deployment, or disable the vulnerable authentication route if feasible. 5) Monitor logs for unusual authentication attempts or anomalies related to api_key usage. 6) Plan migration to alternative, secure authentication solutions or await vendor patches while maintaining heightened monitoring. 7) Educate developers and security teams about the risks of hard-coded keys and enforce secure coding practices to prevent similar issues. 8) Conduct penetration testing focused on authentication bypass attempts to validate mitigations.

Need more detailed analysis?Upgrade to Pro Console

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
VulDB
Date Reserved
2025-12-26T18:10:50.723Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 694fa35cd43a27076d7b384f

Added to database: 12/27/2025, 9:14:04 AM

Last enriched: 1/3/2026, 10:58:56 PM

Last updated: 2/21/2026, 12:23:34 AM

Views: 54

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need more coverage?

Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.

For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.

Latest Threats