VulnerabilityPublished 28 Dec 2025Updated 29 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-15129: ChenJinchuang Lin-CMS-TP5 · Code Injection

Affects ChenJinchuang Lin-CMS-TP5Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 28 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubchenjinchuang/lin-cms-tp5`pkg:github/chenjinchuang/lin-cms-tp5`Other threats	Affected =0.3.0 =0.3.1 =0.3.2 =0.3.3	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediately implement strict input validation and sanitization on all file upload parameters, especially the 'File' argument in the Upload function, to prevent code injection. 2. Temporarily disable or restrict file upload functionality in Lin-CMS-TP5 installations until a vendor patch is released. 3. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious file upload attempts targeting this vulnerability. 4. Monitor server logs and network traffic for unusual activity indicative of exploitation attempts, such as unexpected file uploads or execution of unauthorized scripts. 5. Isolate affected systems from critical networks to limit potential lateral movement if compromise occurs. 6. Consider migrating to alternative, actively maintained CMS platforms with robust security support. 7. Maintain regular backups of affected systems and verify their integrity to enable recovery in case of compromise. 8. Engage with the vendor or community to track patch developments and apply updates promptly once available. 9. Conduct security awareness training for administrators to recognize and respond to exploitation signs. 10. Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) to alert on anomalous behaviors related to file uploads and code execution.

Description

A flaw has been found in ChenJinchuang Lin-CMS-TP5 up to 0.3.3. This vulnerability affects the function Upload of the file application/lib/file/LocalUploader.php of the component File Upload Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument File can lead to code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Impact

For European organizations using Lin-CMS-TP5, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized remote code execution, potentially leading to data breaches, defacement, or complete system takeover. The impact includes loss of confidentiality due to data exposure, integrity violations through unauthorized code execution, and availability disruptions if attackers deploy destructive payloads or ransomware. Organizations relying on Lin-CMS-TP5 for critical web services or internal applications may face operational disruptions and reputational damage. Given the public exploit availability and lack of vendor patch, attackers may rapidly target vulnerable systems. The medium CVSS score reflects moderate impact but ease of exploitation without authentication increases urgency. European entities in sectors such as government, education, and SMEs using this CMS are particularly vulnerable. The threat also extends to supply chain risks if compromised systems serve as pivot points for broader network infiltration.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…