CVE-2025-15183VulnerabilityPublished 29 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-15183: code-projects Refugee Food Management System · SQL Injection

Affects code-projects Refugee Food Management SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 38% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 29 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
code-projects Refugee Food Management System	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate implementation of input validation and sanitization on the 'tfid' parameter in /home/viewtakenfd.php, preferably by using parameterized queries or prepared statements to prevent SQL injection. 2. Restrict network access to the vulnerable endpoint by implementing firewall rules or VPN requirements, limiting exposure to trusted users only. 3. Conduct a thorough code review of the entire application to identify and remediate similar injection flaws. 4. Monitor logs for suspicious query patterns or repeated access attempts targeting the 'tfid' parameter. 5. If possible, isolate the Refugee Food Management System within a segmented network zone to limit lateral movement in case of compromise. 6. Develop and apply patches or updates from the vendor as soon as they become available. 7. Educate staff on the risks of SQL injection and encourage prompt reporting of anomalies. 8. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAF) with rules tailored to detect and block SQL injection attempts targeting this system.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in code-projects Refugee Food Management System 1.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /home/viewtakenfd.php. The manipulation of the argument tfid leads to sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations, especially NGOs, government agencies, and humanitarian groups managing refugee food distribution, this vulnerability poses significant risks. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive personal data of refugees, operational details, or resource allocation information, potentially violating data protection regulations such as GDPR. Data tampering or deletion could disrupt critical food supply chains, impacting vulnerable populations and damaging organizational reputation. The ability to exploit remotely without authentication increases the attack surface, particularly for organizations exposing this system to the internet or poorly segmented internal networks. Additionally, compromised systems could be leveraged as footholds for further attacks within organizational infrastructure. The medium severity score indicates a moderate but tangible threat that requires timely remediation to prevent escalation.

Summary

CVE-2025-15183 identifies a SQL injection vulnerability in the Refugee Food Management System version 1.0 developed by code-projects. The vulnerability resides in the /home/viewtakenfd.php script, specifically in the handling of the 'tfid' parameter. Due to insufficient input validation or sanitization, an attacker can remotely inject crafted SQL commands through this parameter, potentially manipulating backend database queries. This can lead to unauthorized data disclosure, data modification, or deletion, compromising the system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction, making it easier to exploit remotely over the network. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.9 (medium severity), reflecting the ease of exploitation and moderate impact. No official patches or fixes have been published yet, and no known exploits are currently active in the wild, but public disclosure increases the risk of exploitation attempts. The Refugee Food Management System is likely used by organizations managing food distribution for refugees, making the data sensitive and critical. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability to access personal or operational data, disrupt services, or pivot to other parts of the network.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Dec 2025, 23:52 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats