CVE-2025-15214VulnerabilityPublished 30 Dec 2025Updated 24 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-15214: Campcodes Park Ticketing System · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Campcodes Park Ticketing SystemSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 18:53 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubdobkill/CVE`pkg:github/dobkill/CVE`Other threats	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-15214, organizations should implement the following specific measures: 1) Apply strict input validation and sanitization on the 'name' and 'ride' parameters within the save_pricing function to neutralize malicious scripts before processing. 2) Employ context-aware output encoding to ensure any user-supplied data rendered in the admin interface is safe from injection attacks. 3) Restrict administrative access to trusted networks or VPNs to reduce exposure to remote attackers. 4) Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts in the admin interface. 5) Monitor administrative logs and network traffic for unusual activity indicative of exploitation attempts. 6) Educate administrative users about phishing and social engineering risks to reduce the chance of user interaction with malicious payloads. 7) If possible, isolate the ticketing system's administrative interface from public internet access. 8) Engage with the vendor for official patches or updates and prioritize their deployment once available. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific vulnerable parameters and the administrative context of the system.

Description

A vulnerability was found in Campcodes Park Ticketing System 1.0. The impacted element is the function save_pricing of the file admin_class.php. The manipulation of the argument name/ride results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Impact

The primary impact of this vulnerability is on the confidentiality and integrity of administrative sessions within the Campcodes Park Ticketing System. Successful exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of an admin user, potentially leading to session hijacking, theft of sensitive information, or unauthorized modification of ticket pricing and ride configurations. This could disrupt park operations, cause financial losses, and damage customer trust. While availability is not directly affected, indirect impacts such as administrative account compromise could lead to further attacks or downtime. Organizations relying on this system, especially those managing large-scale amusement parks or events, face risks of operational disruption and reputational damage. The medium severity rating reflects the need for user interaction and the limited scope of affected components, but the exposure of administrative functions to remote exploitation increases the threat level. Without timely mitigation, attackers could leverage this vulnerability to gain footholds in critical infrastructure environments.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Feb 2026, 22:38 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats