VulnerabilityPublished 30 Dec 2025

CVE-2025-15249: zhujunliang3 work_platform · Cross-site Scripting

Affects zhujunliang3 work_platformSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 13% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Organizations should implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data within the work_platform, particularly in the Content Handler component. Deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help mitigate the impact of injected scripts. Monitoring web traffic for anomalous requests and employing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules targeting XSS patterns can provide additional protection. Since the vendor has not released a patch, organizations should consider isolating or restricting access to the vulnerable components and educating users about the risks of clicking untrusted links. Regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on XSS vectors are recommended. If possible, contribute to or monitor the project's updates for forthcoming fixes. Finally, ensure that session management and authentication mechanisms are robust to limit the damage from potential exploitation.

Description

A weakness has been identified in zhujunliang3 work_platform up to 6bc5a50bb527ce27f7906d11ea6ec139beb79c31. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Content Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Impact

For European organizations using the zhujunliang3 work_platform, this XSS vulnerability could lead to session hijacking, unauthorized actions performed under a user's credentials, and potential data leakage. Although the impact is medium severity, the risk is amplified in environments where sensitive or regulated data is handled, such as financial, healthcare, or governmental sectors. Attackers could leverage this vulnerability to conduct phishing campaigns or lateral movement within networks. The rolling release nature and lack of vendor response increase the window of exposure. Organizations relying on this platform for internal collaboration or content management may face disruptions or reputational damage if exploited. The vulnerability does not directly affect availability but could indirectly cause service interruptions if exploited at scale or combined with other attacks.

Summary

CVE-2025-15249 identifies a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the zhujunliang3 work_platform, up to commit 6bc5a50bb527ce27f7906d11ea6ec139beb79c31. The vulnerability resides in the Content Handler component, where insufficient sanitization of user-supplied input allows attackers to inject malicious scripts. This flaw can be exploited remotely without authentication but requires user interaction, such as clicking a crafted link or visiting a malicious page. The vulnerability impacts confidentiality and integrity by enabling attackers to execute arbitrary scripts in the context of the victim's browser, potentially stealing session tokens, performing actions on behalf of the user, or delivering further malware. The product's rolling release model complicates tracking affected versions and patch deployment, and the vendor has not yet issued a fix or official response. The CVSS 4.0 score is 5.1 (medium), reflecting the moderate impact and ease of exploitation with some user interaction. No known exploits have been reported in the wild, but the vulnerability remains a concern for users of this platform. Given the nature of XSS, the attack surface includes any web interface components that handle user input without proper encoding or validation.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…