VulnerabilityPublished 20 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-15582: detronetdip E-commerce · Authorization Bypass

Affects detronetdip E-commerceSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 33% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
detronetdipE-commerce	Affected =1.0.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:detronetdip:e-commerce:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

Organizations should immediately audit and restrict access controls to the Product Management Module, ensuring only fully trusted and necessary personnel have privileges to delete or update products. Network segmentation and strict firewall rules should limit access to the management interface to trusted IP addresses. Monitoring and logging of all product management activities should be enhanced to detect suspicious deletion or update attempts. Until an official patch is released, consider implementing web application firewall (WAF) rules to detect and block suspicious manipulation of the ID parameter in requests targeting the Product Management Module. Conduct thorough privilege reviews and revoke unnecessary low-level privileges that could be leveraged to exploit this vulnerability. If possible, deploy temporary compensating controls such as multi-factor authentication for product management operations to add an additional security layer. Engage with the vendor for updates and apply patches promptly once available. Finally, educate staff about the risk and signs of exploitation to improve incident response readiness.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in detronetdip E-commerce 1.0.0. The impacted element is the function Delete/Update of the component Product Management Module. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Impact

The vulnerability allows unauthorized users to bypass authorization controls and delete or update product information remotely, which can lead to significant operational disruptions for organizations relying on detronetdip E-commerce 1.0.0. Unauthorized product deletions or modifications can result in data integrity loss, impacting inventory accuracy, pricing, and availability information. This can degrade customer trust, cause financial losses, and disrupt supply chain and sales processes. Additionally, attackers could leverage this flaw to deface product listings or introduce fraudulent products, potentially damaging brand reputation. Since the vulnerability requires only limited privileges and no user interaction, it lowers the barrier for exploitation, especially if attackers gain low-level access through other means. The absence of vendor response and patches increases exposure time, raising the likelihood of attacks as public exploit code is available. Organizations worldwide using this e-commerce platform face risks of service disruption and data manipulation, which could cascade into broader business impacts.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…