VulnerabilityPublished 20 Feb 2026Updated 23 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-15583: detronetdip E-commerce · Cross-site Scripting

Affects detronetdip E-commerceSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 20% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 20 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
detronetdipE-commerce	Affected =1.0.0	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (1)

cpe:2.3:a:detronetdip:e-commerce:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-15583, organizations should first implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially in the get_safe_value function or equivalent sanitization routines. Employing a robust web application firewall (WAF) configured to detect and block common XSS payloads can provide an immediate protective layer. Organizations should also conduct thorough code reviews and penetration testing focused on input handling to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities. Until an official patch is released, consider isolating or restricting access to vulnerable components and educating users about the risks of clicking suspicious links. Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to limit the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers. Monitoring web server logs for unusual request patterns and user reports of suspicious behavior can help detect exploitation attempts early. Finally, maintain regular backups and have an incident response plan ready to address potential compromises resulting from exploitation.

Description

A weakness has been identified in detronetdip E-commerce 1.0.0. This affects the function get_safe_value of the file utility/function.php. Executing a manipulation can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-15583 is the compromise of user trust and security on affected e-commerce websites. Successful exploitation can lead to theft of sensitive information such as session cookies, login credentials, and personal data, enabling attackers to impersonate legitimate users. This can result in fraudulent transactions, unauthorized access to user accounts, and potential financial losses. Additionally, attackers may use the vulnerability to inject malicious scripts that redirect users to phishing sites or malware distribution points, increasing the risk of broader compromise. For organizations, this vulnerability can damage brand reputation, lead to regulatory penalties for failing to protect customer data, and increase operational costs due to incident response and remediation efforts. Since the vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication but requires user interaction, phishing campaigns or social engineering are likely attack vectors. The lack of vendor response and patch availability prolongs exposure, increasing the window of opportunity for attackers. Overall, the vulnerability poses a moderate risk to organizations relying on detronetdip E-commerce 1.0.0, especially those with high volumes of customer interactions.

Summary

CVE-2025-15583 is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in detronetdip E-commerce version 1.0.0, specifically within the get_safe_value function located in utility/function.php. This function is intended to sanitize input values but contains a weakness that allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code remotely. The vulnerability can be exploited without authentication, making it accessible to any remote attacker who crafts a malicious payload and convinces a user to interact with it, typically by clicking a specially crafted URL or submitting manipulated input. The presence of public exploit code increases the likelihood of exploitation in the wild, although no confirmed active exploitation has been reported yet. The vendor was notified early but has not responded or released a patch, leaving users exposed. The vulnerability impacts the confidentiality and integrity of user data by enabling session hijacking, credential theft, and potentially redirecting users to malicious sites or defacing the e-commerce interface. The CVSS 4.0 vector indicates network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, but user interaction is necessary, with limited impact on integrity and no impact on availability or confidentiality. This vulnerability highlights the importance of proper input validation and output encoding in web applications, especially in e-commerce platforms where user trust and data security are critical.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…