CVE-2025-1891VulnerabilityPublished 3 Mar 2025Updated 28 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-1891: shishuocms · Cross-Site Request Forgery

Affects shishuocmsSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Mar 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
shishuocms	Affected =1.1	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Since no official patches are currently available, European organizations should implement several specific mitigations: 1) Enforce strict anti-CSRF tokens in all state-changing requests within shishuocms to validate legitimate user actions. 2) Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the domains from which scripts can be loaded, reducing the risk of malicious script execution. 3) Educate users, especially administrators, about phishing and social engineering tactics to prevent inadvertent interaction with malicious links. 4) Limit user privileges to the minimum necessary, reducing the potential impact if an account is compromised. 5) Monitor web server logs for unusual or unauthorized requests that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6) If possible, isolate the CMS environment behind additional authentication layers or VPNs to restrict access. 7) Regularly back up CMS data to enable quick recovery in case of content tampering. 8) Stay updated with vendor announcements for patches or official fixes and apply them promptly once available.

Description

A vulnerability was found in shishuocms 1.1 and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Impact

For European organizations using shishuocms 1.1, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized actions being performed within their CMS environment. This could lead to unauthorized content changes, defacement, or manipulation of website data, potentially damaging the organization's reputation and trustworthiness. While the confidentiality and availability impacts are minimal, the integrity compromise can disrupt business operations and content reliability. Organizations with web portals or public-facing content managed by shishuocms are particularly at risk, especially if users with elevated privileges are targeted. The requirement for user interaction means phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to exploit this vulnerability. Given the public disclosure, attackers may develop exploits, increasing the risk over time. The lack of known active exploitation currently provides a window for mitigation, but organizations should act promptly to reduce exposure. The impact is more significant for sectors relying heavily on web content management for customer engagement, such as media, education, and government services within Europe.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…