Skip to main content

CVE-2025-22048: Vulnerability in Linux Linux

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-22048cvecve-2025-22048
Published: Wed Apr 16 2025 (04/16/2025, 14:12:07 UTC)
Source: CVE
Vendor/Project: Linux
Product: Linux

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: BPF: Don't override subprog's return value The verifier test `calls: div by 0 in subprog` triggers a panic at the ld.bu instruction. The ld.bu insn is trying to load byte from memory address returned by the subprog. The subprog actually set the correct address at the a5 register (dedicated register for BPF return values). But at commit 73c359d1d356 ("LoongArch: BPF: Sign-extend return values") we also sign extended a5 to the a0 register (return value in LoongArch). For function call insn, we later propagate the a0 register back to a5 register. This is right for native calls but wrong for bpf2bpf calls which expect zero-extended return value in a5 register. So only move a0 to a5 for native calls (i.e. non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 07/03/2025, 20:27:29 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-22048 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel specifically affecting the LoongArch architecture's implementation of the Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) subsystem. The issue arises from incorrect handling of return values in BPF subprogram calls. In detail, the vulnerability is related to the verifier test 'calls: div by 0 in subprog' which triggers a kernel panic at the ld.bu instruction. This instruction attempts to load a byte from a memory address returned by a BPF subprogram. The subprogram correctly sets the address in the a5 register, which is dedicated for BPF return values. However, a recent kernel commit (73c359d1d356) introduced sign-extension of the a5 register value into the a0 register for LoongArch. While this is appropriate for native function calls, the kernel erroneously propagates the a0 register back to a5 for all function call instructions, including bpf2bpf calls. The bpf2bpf calls expect zero-extended return values in a5, so this propagation corrupts the return value, leading to invalid memory access and a kernel panic. The fix involves restricting the propagation of a0 to a5 only to native calls (non-BPF_PSEUDO_CALL), preserving correct zero-extension semantics for bpf2bpf calls. This vulnerability can cause denial of service (DoS) through kernel panic when processing crafted BPF programs on affected LoongArch Linux kernels. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet, and the vulnerability is specific to the LoongArch architecture, which is less common than x86 or ARM. The affected versions are identified by specific kernel commit hashes, indicating the vulnerability was introduced and fixed in recent kernel development cycles. The issue is technical and subtle, involving low-level register handling in the BPF verifier and loader components of the kernel.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-22048 is the potential for denial of service attacks on Linux systems running on LoongArch architecture processors. While LoongArch is not widely deployed in Europe compared to x86_64 or ARM architectures, organizations using specialized hardware or embedded systems with LoongArch processors could experience kernel panics triggered by malicious or malformed BPF programs. This could disrupt critical services, especially in environments relying on BPF for networking, monitoring, or security functions. The vulnerability does not appear to allow privilege escalation or arbitrary code execution directly, limiting its impact to availability concerns. However, denial of service in kernel space can have cascading effects on system reliability and uptime. Given the lack of known exploits, the immediate risk is low, but targeted attackers aware of this flaw could craft BPF programs to disrupt vulnerable systems. European organizations with research, industrial, or governmental deployments using LoongArch-based Linux systems should be particularly vigilant. The impact is less relevant for the majority of European enterprises using mainstream architectures but remains a concern for niche deployments and supply chain components that might incorporate LoongArch hardware.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-22048, European organizations should: 1) Identify and inventory Linux systems running on LoongArch architecture to assess exposure. 2) Apply the latest Linux kernel patches that address this vulnerability as soon as they become available, ensuring the fix restricting a0 to a5 propagation to native calls is included. 3) For systems where immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling or restricting BPF usage, especially untrusted or user-supplied BPF programs, to reduce attack surface. 4) Monitor kernel logs and system behavior for signs of kernel panics or crashes related to BPF program execution. 5) Engage with hardware and software vendors to confirm LoongArch kernel versions and patch status. 6) Implement strict access controls and code signing for BPF programs to prevent unauthorized or malicious BPF code execution. 7) Incorporate this vulnerability into vulnerability management and incident response plans to ensure rapid detection and remediation. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on architecture-specific identification, patch prioritization, and operational controls tailored to BPF usage and LoongArch environments.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
Linux
Date Reserved
2024-12-29T08:45:45.810Z
Cisa Enriched
false
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 682d9820c4522896dcbdd3ee

Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:48 AM

Last enriched: 7/3/2025, 8:27:29 PM

Last updated: 8/15/2025, 6:27:49 AM

Views: 11

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats