CVE-2025-23235VulnerabilityPublished 8 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-23235: OpenHarmony · Out-of-bounds Read

Affects OpenHarmonySource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.3 Low.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

3.3Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
OpenHarmony OpenHarmony	Affected =5.0.1 <=5.0.3	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Inventory and identify all devices running OpenHarmony, particularly version 5.0.3 and earlier, to assess exposure. 2) Restrict local access to devices by enforcing strict physical security controls and network segmentation to limit attacker proximity. 3) Monitor device logs and behavior for signs of crashes or abnormal restarts that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4) Engage with OpenHarmony community and vendors to obtain patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-23235 as they become available; prioritize timely patching once released. 5) Implement intrusion detection systems capable of detecting anomalous local activity on IoT devices. 6) For critical systems, consider deploying redundancy or failover mechanisms to minimize impact from potential DoS conditions. 7) Educate local administrators and users about the risks of local exploitation and enforce least privilege principles to reduce attack surface.

Description

in OpenHarmony v5.0.3 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause DOS through out-of-bounds read.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-23235 depends largely on the deployment of OpenHarmony-based devices within their infrastructure. OpenHarmony targets IoT and embedded systems, which are increasingly used in industrial control systems, smart city infrastructure, and consumer electronics. A local attacker exploiting this vulnerability could cause device crashes leading to service interruptions or operational downtime. While the vulnerability does not compromise data confidentiality or integrity, availability disruptions in critical IoT devices could affect business continuity, especially in sectors relying on real-time data and automation. The low severity and requirement for local access limit the threat to environments where attackers can gain physical or local network access. Organizations with extensive IoT deployments should assess their exposure, as compromised devices could cascade failures or require costly manual interventions. The lack of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the need for vigilance and proactive mitigation.

CWE-125Out-of-bounds Read (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #8
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design · Language Selection
Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Overread Buffers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

gitee.com/openharmony/security/blob/master/zh/security-disclosure/2025/2025-06.md (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 9 Jul 2025, 00:41 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-125

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats