VulnerabilityPublished 11 Feb 2025Updated 10 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-23363: Siemens Teamcenter V14.1 · Open Redirect

Affects Siemens Teamcenter V14.1Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.4 High · fixed in 2412.0004 : patch Siemens Teamcenter V14.1 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.4High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.5% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 46% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2412.0004, 2406.0008, 2312.0010 +1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Feb 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade com.siemens/teamcenter to 2412.0004, 2406.0008, 2312.0010 or 14.3.0.14.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mavencom.siemens/teamcenter`pkg:maven/com.siemens/teamcenter`Other threats	Affected <14.3.0.14 <2312.0010 <2406.0008 <2412.0004	Fixed in 14.3.0.14 2312.0010 2406.0008 2412.0004

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

2) Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules designed to detect and block suspicious URL redirection patterns targeting Teamcenter endpoints. 3) Conduct user awareness training focused on recognizing phishing attempts and suspicious links, emphasizing the risks of clicking unexpected URLs even from seemingly legitimate sources. 4) Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for Teamcenter access to reduce the impact of stolen session credentials. 5) Monitor logs for unusual redirect requests and anomalous login behaviors to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 6) Use Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the domains that can be loaded or navigated to from Teamcenter web pages. 7) Segment the network to limit access to Teamcenter systems and isolate critical PLM infrastructure from general user networks. These measures collectively reduce the attack surface and limit the potential damage from this open redirect vulnerability.

Description

A vulnerability has been identified in Teamcenter V14.1 (All versions), Teamcenter V14.2 (All versions), Teamcenter V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.14), Teamcenter V2312 (All versions < V2312.0010), Teamcenter V2406 (All versions < V2406.0008), Teamcenter V2412 (All versions < V2412.0004). The SSO login service of affected applications accepts user-controlled input that could specify a link to an external site. This could allow an attacker to redirect the legitimate user to an attacker-chosen URL to steal valid session data. For a successful exploit, the legitimate user must actively click on an attacker-crafted link.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those in manufacturing, automotive, aerospace, and industrial engineering sectors that rely heavily on Siemens Teamcenter for PLM, this vulnerability poses a substantial risk. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to confidential intellectual property, design documents, and operational plans, potentially resulting in industrial espionage, intellectual property theft, or sabotage. The open redirect could also be used as a vector for phishing campaigns targeting employees, increasing the risk of credential theft and further network compromise. Given the critical role of Teamcenter in managing product data, any compromise could disrupt business continuity and damage competitive advantage. Additionally, organizations subject to GDPR must consider the implications of unauthorized data access and potential data breaches, which could lead to regulatory penalties and reputational damage. The requirement for user interaction somewhat limits exploitation but does not eliminate risk, as phishing and social engineering remain effective attack methods.

CWE-601URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: LowOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web application accepts a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site, and uses that link in a redirect.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
Architecture and Design
Use an intermediate disclaimer page that provides the user with a clear warning that they are leaving the current site. Implement a long timeout before the redirect occurs, or force the user to click on the link. Be careful to avoid XSS problems (CWE-79) when generating the disclaimer page.
Architecture and Design · Enforcement by Conversion
When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.1.5 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Cross-Site Flashing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-656895.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Jul 2025, 00:18 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-601

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats