CVE-2025-24305: Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors · Escalation of Privilege
Affects Intel(R) Xeon(R) processorsSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.0 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 3% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.
What to do
AI-suggested
1. Monitor Intel's official security advisories closely and apply firmware updates or patches for the ACTM firmware as soon as they become available. 2. Restrict local privileged access strictly to trusted personnel and enforce the principle of least privilege to minimize the number of users with high-level access. 3. Implement robust access controls and multi-factor authentication for administrative accounts to reduce the risk of privilege abuse. 4. Employ endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of monitoring unusual privilege escalation attempts or suspicious activity at the kernel or firmware level. 5. Use hardware-based security features and virtualization-based security to isolate critical workloads and limit the impact of potential privilege escalations. 6. Conduct regular audits of privileged user activities and system logs to detect early signs of exploitation attempts. 7. In environments where patching may be delayed, consider temporary compensating controls such as disabling unnecessary local accounts or restricting physical access to affected systems. 8. Collaborate with hardware vendors and security teams to validate firmware integrity and ensure secure boot processes are enforced.
Description
Insufficient control flow management in the Alias Checking Trusted Module (ACTM) firmware for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.