CVE-2025-25229VulnerabilityPublished 11 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-25229: Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM · Server-Side Request Forgery

Affects Omnissa Workspace ONE UEMSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.4 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.4Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 8% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Omnissa Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM	Affected <=24.10.0.10 <=24.6.0.34 <=24.2.0.29 <=23.10.0.49	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting user privileges to the minimum necessary, ensuring that only trusted users have access to the Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM system. 2. Network segmentation should be enforced to limit the UEM server's ability to access sensitive internal resources, reducing the impact of SSRF exploitation. 3. Implement strict input validation and filtering on all requests processed by the UEM server to detect and block SSRF attempts. 4. Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual outbound requests originating from the UEM server that could indicate SSRF exploitation attempts. 5. Apply any available vendor patches or updates as soon as they are released; if patches are not yet available, consider temporary workarounds such as disabling vulnerable features or restricting network access to the UEM server. 6. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on SSRF and related vulnerabilities within the UEM environment. 7. Educate administrators and users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of adhering to security best practices when using the UEM platform. 8. Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (IDS/IPS) configured to detect SSRF patterns targeting the UEM system.

Description

Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability. A malicious actor with user privileges may be able to access restricted internal system information, potentially enabling enumeration of internal network resources.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-25229 can be significant, especially for enterprises relying on Omnissa Workspace ONE UEM for device and application management. The ability for an attacker with user privileges to perform SSRF and enumerate internal network resources can lead to exposure of sensitive internal infrastructure details, which may facilitate lateral movement, targeted attacks, or data exfiltration in subsequent stages. Confidentiality is at risk as internal system information could be leaked. Integrity is also impacted since the attacker might manipulate requests to internal services, potentially altering data or configurations indirectly. Although availability is not directly affected, the reconnaissance enabled by this vulnerability can be a precursor to more damaging attacks. European organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure, which often have strict regulatory requirements for data protection (e.g., GDPR), may face compliance risks if internal network information is exposed. Moreover, the presence of this vulnerability in a centralized management platform increases the attack surface, as compromising the UEM system could have cascading effects on managed endpoints. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not immediately critical, it should be addressed promptly to prevent escalation and exploitation in complex attack chains.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Aug 2025, 18:48 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats