CVE-2025-26448VulnerabilityPublished 4 Sep 2025Updated 5 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-26448: Google Android · Information disclosure

Affects Google AndroidSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.08% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Google Android	Affected =15 =14 =13	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should: 1) Ensure timely updates and patches from Google are applied as soon as they become available for Android versions 13-15. 2) Enforce strict mobile device management (MDM) policies to restrict installation of untrusted or unnecessary applications that could exploit local vulnerabilities. 3) Limit local access to devices by enforcing strong authentication and physical security controls to prevent unauthorized users from gaining local access. 4) Monitor device behavior for unusual activity that could indicate exploitation attempts, such as unexpected memory access patterns or app behavior anomalies. 5) Educate users about risks of installing apps from untrusted sources and the importance of device security hygiene. 6) Consider deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of detecting suspicious local activity on mobile devices. 7) Review and audit applications with elevated privileges to ensure they do not inadvertently expose sensitive data through IPC or parceling mechanisms. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on controlling local access, application vetting, and proactive monitoring tailored to this vulnerability's characteristics.

Description

In writeToParcel of CursorWindow.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to mobile devices running Android versions 13 through 15, which are common in enterprise and consumer environments. The information disclosure could lead to leakage of sensitive corporate data, credentials, or personally identifiable information (PII) stored or processed on affected devices. This could facilitate targeted phishing, credential theft, or lateral movement within corporate networks if attackers gain local access. The lack of required user interaction increases the risk of stealthy exploitation by malicious insiders or compromised apps. While the vulnerability does not allow code execution or denial of service, the confidentiality breach could have regulatory implications under GDPR, especially if personal data is exposed. Organizations relying on Android devices for secure communications, mobile workforce, or BYOD policies should be aware of this risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate threat but does not eliminate the risk of future exploitation. The vulnerability also highlights the importance of controlling local access to devices and monitoring for suspicious app behavior.

CWE-457Use of Uninitialized Variable (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: High
The code uses a variable that has not been initialized, leading to unpredictable or unintended results.
Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Ensure that critical variables are initialized before first use.
Build and Compilation · Compilation or Build Hardening
Most compilers will complain about the use of uninitialized variables if warnings are turned on.
Implementation · Operation
When using a language that does not require explicit declaration of variables, run or compile the software in a mode that reports undeclared or unknown variables. This may indicate the presence of a typographic error in the variable's name.
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 11 Sep 2025, 20:17 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-457

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats