VulnerabilityPublished 4 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-27064: Qualcomm Snapdragon · Buffer Over-read

Affects Qualcomm SnapdragonSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.08% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Organizations should implement a multi-layered mitigation strategy beyond generic patching advice. First, inventory all devices using affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, including mobile, automotive, and IoT devices, to understand exposure. Restrict local access to these devices by enforcing strict physical security controls and network segmentation to limit potential attacker proximity. Deploy endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of monitoring unusual local command registrations or diagnostic interface usage. Collaborate with device vendors and Qualcomm for timely security patches and firmware updates; prioritize patching on high-value or sensitive devices. Where patching is delayed, consider disabling or restricting diagnostic interfaces (diag/diagHal) if feasible without impacting critical functionality. Implement strict access controls and privilege management to minimize the number of users with local low-level access. Conduct regular security audits and penetration tests focusing on local privilege abuse scenarios. Finally, educate staff about the risks of local device access and enforce policies to prevent unauthorized physical or network access to vulnerable devices.

Description

Information disclosure while registering commands from clients with diag through diagHal.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-27064 is the potential unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information from devices using affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. This could include mobile phones, automotive telematics units, and IoT devices prevalent in enterprise and industrial environments. Confidentiality breaches may expose personal data, cryptographic keys, or proprietary information, increasing risks of targeted attacks or compliance violations under GDPR. The vulnerability requires local access with low privileges, which limits remote exploitation but raises concerns in environments where physical or local network access is possible, such as corporate offices, manufacturing plants, or automotive service centers. The wide range of affected chipsets means many device types could be vulnerable, complicating asset management and patch deployment. Although integrity and availability impacts are minimal, the information disclosure could facilitate subsequent attacks like privilege escalation or lateral movement. European organizations in sectors with high reliance on Qualcomm-powered devices, including telecommunications, automotive manufacturing, and critical infrastructure, face increased risk exposure.

CWE-126Buffer Over-read (opens in a new tab)
Variant weakness
The product reads from a buffer using buffer access mechanisms such as indexes or pointers that reference memory locations after the targeted buffer.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

docs.qualcomm.com/product/publicresources/securitybulletin/november-2025-bulletin.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Nov 2025, 04:03 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-126

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats