VulnerabilityPublished 27 Oct 2025

CVE-2025-27225: TRUfusion Enterprise · Information Exposure

Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · public detection template (Nuclei) · 18% EPSS · CVSS 7.5 High · fixed in 7.10.4.1 : patch affected systems soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 18.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 97% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 7.10.4.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Oct 2025
Detectable: evidence found.
nuclei template: TRUfusion Enterprise <= 7.10.4.0 - Admin Contact Portal
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Immediate mitigation should focus on restricting access to the vulnerable endpoint by implementing network-level controls such as IP whitelisting, VPN-only access, or firewall rules to limit exposure to trusted internal networks. Organizations should conduct thorough audits of TRUfusion Enterprise deployments to identify and secure any exposed administrative or internal endpoints. If vendor patches become available, prompt application is critical. In the absence of patches, consider disabling or removing the vulnerable JSP page if feasible. Implement web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to detect and block unauthorized access attempts to the endpoint. Regularly monitor logs for unusual access patterns targeting /trufusionPortal/jsp/internal_admin_contact_login.jsp. Conduct employee training on phishing and social engineering risks that may arise from leaked contact information. Finally, review and enhance overall access control policies and secure coding practices to prevent similar exposures.

Description

TRUfusion Enterprise through 7.10.4.0 exposes the /trufusionPortal/jsp/internal_admin_contact_login.jsp endpoint to unauthenticated users. This endpoint discloses sensitive internal information including PII to unauthenticated attackers.

Impact

For European organizations, the exposure of PII through this vulnerability can lead to severe privacy breaches, violating GDPR and other data protection regulations, which may result in substantial fines and reputational damage. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government that rely on TRUfusion Enterprise for internal operations are particularly at risk. The unauthorized disclosure of internal contact information could facilitate targeted phishing, social engineering, or further intrusion attempts. Additionally, the breach of confidentiality could undermine trust with customers and partners. Since the vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, it can be exploited remotely by any attacker scanning for the exposed endpoint, increasing the attack surface. The lack of known exploits in the wild suggests a window of opportunity for defenders to remediate before widespread abuse occurs.

CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #20OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Logging (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V7.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Subverting Environment Variable Values (opens in a new tab)
ICMP Echo Request Ping (opens in a new tab)
TCP SYN Scan (opens in a new tab)
Enumerate Mail Exchange (MX) Records (opens in a new tab)
DNS Zone Transfers (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 17:49 UTC

Public exploits and detectiona Nuclei detection template

WeaknessesCWE-200

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats