VulnerabilityPublished 4 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-27550: IBM Jazz Reporting Service · CWE-497

Affects IBM Jazz Reporting ServiceSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.5 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

3.5Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 12% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IBMJazz Reporting Service	Affected >=7.1 <=7.1iFix006 >=7.0.3 <=7.0.3iFix020	Fixed in–

CPE configurations (4)

cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.0.3:iFix020:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:jazz_reporting_service:7.1:iFix006:*:*:*:*:*:*

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should implement strict access controls ensuring that authenticated users only have access to projects they are authorized to view. Network segmentation should be enforced to limit host network exposure and reduce lateral movement opportunities. Monitoring and logging of access to the Jazz Reporting Service should be enhanced to detect unusual or unauthorized access patterns. Until IBM releases official patches, consider applying compensating controls such as restricting Jazz Reporting Service access to trusted users and networks only. Regularly review and update user permissions to minimize privilege creep. Employ multi-factor authentication to reduce the risk of compromised credentials being used to exploit this vulnerability. Additionally, conduct internal audits of project data exposure and educate users about the risks of unauthorized data sharing within the platform. Stay informed about IBM’s security advisories for any forthcoming patches or updates addressing this issue.

Description

IBM Jazz Reporting Service could allow an authenticated user on the host network to obtain sensitive information about other projects that reside on the server.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact is unauthorized disclosure of sensitive project information within internal networks. This could lead to leakage of proprietary data, project plans, or other confidential details that might be leveraged for competitive advantage or further cyberattacks. While the vulnerability does not affect system integrity or availability, the confidentiality breach could undermine trust, violate data protection policies, and potentially contravene GDPR if personal or sensitive data is involved. Organizations relying on IBM Jazz Reporting Service for collaborative reporting and project management are at risk, especially if internal access controls are weak or if network segmentation is insufficient. The threat is particularly relevant for industries with high intellectual property value such as software development, manufacturing, and research institutions prevalent in Europe. Although no active exploits are known, the vulnerability could be exploited by malicious insiders or attackers who have gained authenticated access, emphasizing the need for internal security vigilance.

CWE-497Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not properly prevent sensitive system-level information from being accessed by unauthorized actors who do not have the same level of access to the underlying system as the product does.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Production applications should never use methods that generate internal details such as stack traces and error messages unless that information is directly committed to a log that is not viewable by the end user.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Error Handling (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V14.3.2 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Web Application Fingerprinting (opens in a new tab)
System Location Discovery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

ibm.com/support/pages/node/7258083 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

CPE configurations (4)

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Feb 2026, 21:29 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-497

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats