CVE-2025-29939: AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors · Improper Access Control
Affects AMD EPYC™ 9004 Series ProcessorsSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 4% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:NExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| AMDAMD EPYC™ 9004 Series Processors | Affected– | Fixed in– |
| AMDAMD EPYC™ 7003 Series Processors | Affected– | Fixed in– |
| AMDAMD EPYC™ 9005 Series Processors | Affected– | Fixed in– |
| AMDAMD EPYC™ 8004 Series Processors | Affected– | Fixed in– |
| AMDAMD EPYC™ Embedded 7003 Series Processors | Affected– | Fixed in– |
| AMDAMD EPYC™ Embedded 9004 Series Processors (formerly codenamed "Genoa") | Affected– | Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
- Monitor AMD and relevant vendor advisories closely for patches or microcode updates addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available.
- Restrict and harden access to host systems and hypervisors to prevent attackers from gaining the high privileges required to exploit this flaw.
- Employ strict access controls, multi-factor authentication, and continuous monitoring on virtualization hosts.
- Consider disabling SEV or SNP features temporarily if feasible and if risk tolerance allows, until patches are applied.
- Use runtime security tools that can detect anomalous memory access patterns or unauthorized modifications to critical data structures like the RMP.
- Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focused on virtualization security controls.
- Segment and isolate critical workloads to limit potential lateral movement in case of host compromise.
- Collaborate with cloud providers to understand their mitigation strategies if using hosted services running on AMD EPYC 9004 processors.
- Maintain up-to-date inventory of hardware and virtualization features in use to prioritize risk assessment and response.
Description
Improper access control in secure encrypted virtualization (SEV) could allow a privileged attacker to write to the reverse map page (RMP) during secure nested paging (SNP) initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of guest memory confidentiality and integrity.