CVE-2025-30103VulnerabilityPublished 30 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-30103: Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software · Exposed Files or Directories

Affects Dell SmartFabric OS10 SoftwareSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium : upgrade to 10.6.0.5 when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 7% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 10.6.0.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Local
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Local: The vulnerable component is not bound to the network stack and the attacker’s path is via read/write/execute capabilities. Either: the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software to 10.6.0.5.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software	Affected <10.6.0.5	Fixed in 10.6.0.5

AI-suggested

Organizations should prioritize upgrading Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software to version 10.6.0.5 or later once the patch is released by Dell. Until then, practical mitigations include restricting local access to devices running the affected software by enforcing strict physical and logical access controls, such as network segmentation, role-based access controls, and multi-factor authentication for administrative access. Monitoring and logging local access attempts can help detect suspicious activities early. Additionally, organizations should audit filesystem permissions and configurations to ensure sensitive files are not unnecessarily exposed. Employing host-based intrusion detection systems (HIDS) to monitor filesystem access patterns may provide early warning of exploitation attempts. Regular security training for personnel with local access can reduce the risk of insider threats exploiting this vulnerability.

Description

Dell SmartFabric OS10 Software, versions prior to 10.6.0.5 contains a Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Filesystem access for attacker.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability can be significant, especially for enterprises and service providers relying on Dell SmartFabric OS10 in their network infrastructure. Exposure of sensitive filesystem data could lead to leakage of configuration files, credentials, or other critical information that attackers could leverage for further attacks or lateral movement within the network. This is particularly concerning for sectors with stringent data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government institutions in Europe. While the vulnerability requires local access, this could be achieved through compromised internal systems or insider threats. The confidentiality breach could undermine compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations, potentially resulting in legal and financial repercussions. Since the vulnerability does not affect integrity or availability directly, immediate operational disruption is unlikely, but the information disclosure risk remains a serious concern.

CWE-552Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product makes files or directories accessible to unauthorized actors, even though they should not be.
Implementation · System Configuration · Operation
When storing data in the cloud (e.g., S3 buckets, Azure blobs, Google Cloud Storage, etc.), use the provider's controls to disable public access.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
V12.4.1 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Collect Data from Common Resource Locations (opens in a new tab)
Probe System Files (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000346195/dsa-2025-259-security-update-for-dell-networking-os10-vulnerabilities (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Jul 2025, 18:48 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-552

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats