CVE-2025-30739VulnerabilityPublished 15 Jul 2025Updated 17 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-30739: Oracle CRM Technical Foundation · Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to

Affects Oracle CRM Technical FoundationSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.5 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mavencom.oracle/OracleCRMTechnicalFoundation`pkg:maven/com.oracle/OracleCRMTechnicalFoundation`Other threats	Affected =12.2.11 =12.2.12 =12.2.13	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediate review and restriction of high-privilege accounts with network access to Oracle CRM Technical Foundation to minimize the attack surface. 2. Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to limit HTTP access to Oracle CRM Technical Foundation components only to trusted administrative hosts. 3. Monitor logs and audit trails for unusual update, insert, or delete operations within the CRM data to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 4. 5. Conduct a thorough review of integrations with other Oracle products to identify and secure any extended attack surfaces due to the scope change. 6. Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all high-privilege accounts to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 7. Regularly perform internal penetration testing focusing on privilege escalation and unauthorized data access within Oracle E-Business Suite environments. 8. Educate privileged users about the risks and enforce the principle of least privilege to limit unnecessary access rights.

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle CRM Technical Foundation product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Preferences). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.11-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle CRM Technical Foundation. While the vulnerability is in Oracle CRM Technical Foundation, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle CRM Technical Foundation accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle CRM Technical Foundation accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.5 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk primarily to those using Oracle E-Business Suite with the affected CRM Technical Foundation versions. The unauthorized modification or reading of CRM data can lead to data integrity issues, loss of trust in customer relationship management processes, and potential regulatory compliance violations under GDPR if personal data is exposed or altered. The scope change warning indicates that other Oracle products integrated with or dependent on the CRM Technical Foundation could also be compromised, amplifying the impact. This could disrupt business operations, affect customer service quality, and expose sensitive business intelligence. Since the vulnerability requires high privileges, the risk is heightened if internal threat actors or compromised privileged accounts exist. The lack of user interaction needed means automated exploitation is feasible once access is gained. European organizations with complex Oracle deployments, especially in finance, telecommunications, and manufacturing sectors, could face operational and reputational damage if this vulnerability is exploited.

CWE-863Incorrect Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #17OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2025.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 23 Jul 2025, 01:33 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-863

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats