VulnerabilityPublished 15 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-30744: Oracle Mobile Field Service · Incorrect Authorization

Affects Oracle Mobile Field ServiceSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.1 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 15 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Mavencom.oracle/mobile-field-service`pkg:maven/com.oracle/mobile-field-service`Other threats	Affected =12.2.3	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

2) Restrict network access to Oracle Mobile Field Service interfaces by implementing network segmentation and firewall rules to limit HTTP access only to trusted internal networks and VPN users. 3) Enforce strict role-based access controls (RBAC) within Oracle Mobile Field Service to minimize privileges granted to users, ensuring that only necessary permissions are assigned, reducing the risk posed by low-privileged attackers. 4) Monitor logs and audit trails for unusual activities related to data creation, deletion, or modification within the Oracle Mobile Field Service environment to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 5) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on authorization mechanisms to identify and remediate similar weaknesses proactively. 6) Educate IT and security teams about this vulnerability and ensure incident response plans include scenarios involving unauthorized data manipulation in field service applications. 7) Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious HTTP requests targeting Oracle Mobile Field Service endpoints.

Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle Mobile Field Service product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Multiplatform Sync Errors). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Mobile Field Service. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Mobile Field Service accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Mobile Field Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-30744 can be substantial, especially for those relying on Oracle Mobile Field Service for managing field service operations, asset maintenance, or customer service workflows. Unauthorized modification or deletion of critical data could disrupt service delivery, cause operational downtime, and damage customer trust. The confidentiality breach could expose sensitive customer or operational data, potentially violating GDPR and other data protection regulations, leading to legal and financial penalties. Integrity compromises may result in incorrect service records, impacting billing, compliance reporting, and operational decision-making. Since the vulnerability does not affect availability, direct denial-of-service is less likely, but the indirect operational impact could be severe. The ease of exploitation combined with network accessibility means attackers could leverage this vulnerability for espionage, sabotage, or as a foothold for further lateral movement within enterprise networks. European organizations in sectors such as utilities, telecommunications, manufacturing, and logistics that use Oracle Mobile Field Service are particularly at risk due to their reliance on accurate and secure field service data.

CWE-863Incorrect Authorization (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #17OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action, but it does not correctly perform the check.
Architecture and Design
Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Architecture and Design
Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V7.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2025.html (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 22 Jul 2025, 20:53 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-863

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats