CVE-2025-31992: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in HCL Software MaxAI Assistant
HCL Unica MaxAI Assistant is susceptible to a HTML injection vulnerability. An attacker could insert special characters that are processed client-side in the context of the user's session.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-31992 identifies a vulnerability in HCL Software's MaxAI Assistant, specifically versions 12.1.10 through 25.1, where improper neutralization of script-related HTML tags (classified under CWE-80) leads to a basic cross-site scripting (XSS) or HTML injection flaw. This vulnerability allows an attacker to insert specially crafted characters or HTML content that is processed client-side within the context of a legitimate user's session. The attack vector is network-based and requires the attacker to have at least limited privileges (PR:L) and to convince a user to interact with the malicious input (UI:R). The vulnerability does not require elevated privileges beyond limited user access but does require authentication, which reduces the attack surface. The CVSS v3.1 score of 4.6 (medium severity) reflects the limited impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability. The vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of information or manipulation of displayed content, potentially facilitating phishing or session hijacking attacks. No public exploits have been reported, and no patches are currently linked, indicating that remediation may be pending or in development. The vulnerability is relevant for organizations using MaxAI Assistant, particularly those integrating it into web-facing applications or internal portals where user input is processed and rendered.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to confidentiality and integrity of user sessions within MaxAI Assistant environments. Attackers exploiting this flaw could execute malicious scripts that steal session tokens, manipulate displayed data, or redirect users to phishing sites, potentially leading to credential theft or unauthorized access to sensitive marketing or customer data. Given MaxAI Assistant's role in marketing automation and AI-driven customer engagement, compromised data integrity could damage brand reputation and customer trust. The requirement for user interaction and authentication limits large-scale automated exploitation but targeted attacks against privileged users or administrators remain a concern. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on digital marketing and customer data analytics are particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the lack of current known exploits provides a window for proactive mitigation before widespread attacks occur.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Apply patches or updates from HCL Software as soon as they become available to address the vulnerability directly. 2) Enforce strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data within MaxAI Assistant interfaces to prevent injection of malicious HTML or scripts. 3) Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict execution of unauthorized scripts and reduce the impact of potential XSS attacks. 4) Limit user privileges to the minimum necessary, reducing the risk posed by authenticated attackers. 5) Conduct regular security awareness training to educate users about the risks of interacting with suspicious content. 6) Monitor application logs and user activity for unusual behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 7) Consider implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules tailored to detect and block XSS payloads targeting MaxAI Assistant endpoints. These measures, combined, will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation beyond generic advice.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-31992: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in HCL Software MaxAI Assistant
Description
HCL Unica MaxAI Assistant is susceptible to a HTML injection vulnerability. An attacker could insert special characters that are processed client-side in the context of the user's session.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-31992 identifies a vulnerability in HCL Software's MaxAI Assistant, specifically versions 12.1.10 through 25.1, where improper neutralization of script-related HTML tags (classified under CWE-80) leads to a basic cross-site scripting (XSS) or HTML injection flaw. This vulnerability allows an attacker to insert specially crafted characters or HTML content that is processed client-side within the context of a legitimate user's session. The attack vector is network-based and requires the attacker to have at least limited privileges (PR:L) and to convince a user to interact with the malicious input (UI:R). The vulnerability does not require elevated privileges beyond limited user access but does require authentication, which reduces the attack surface. The CVSS v3.1 score of 4.6 (medium severity) reflects the limited impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability. The vulnerability could lead to unauthorized disclosure of information or manipulation of displayed content, potentially facilitating phishing or session hijacking attacks. No public exploits have been reported, and no patches are currently linked, indicating that remediation may be pending or in development. The vulnerability is relevant for organizations using MaxAI Assistant, particularly those integrating it into web-facing applications or internal portals where user input is processed and rendered.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to confidentiality and integrity of user sessions within MaxAI Assistant environments. Attackers exploiting this flaw could execute malicious scripts that steal session tokens, manipulate displayed data, or redirect users to phishing sites, potentially leading to credential theft or unauthorized access to sensitive marketing or customer data. Given MaxAI Assistant's role in marketing automation and AI-driven customer engagement, compromised data integrity could damage brand reputation and customer trust. The requirement for user interaction and authentication limits large-scale automated exploitation but targeted attacks against privileged users or administrators remain a concern. Organizations in sectors with high reliance on digital marketing and customer data analytics are particularly vulnerable. Additionally, the lack of current known exploits provides a window for proactive mitigation before widespread attacks occur.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Apply patches or updates from HCL Software as soon as they become available to address the vulnerability directly. 2) Enforce strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data within MaxAI Assistant interfaces to prevent injection of malicious HTML or scripts. 3) Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict execution of unauthorized scripts and reduce the impact of potential XSS attacks. 4) Limit user privileges to the minimum necessary, reducing the risk posed by authenticated attackers. 5) Conduct regular security awareness training to educate users about the risks of interacting with suspicious content. 6) Monitor application logs and user activity for unusual behavior indicative of exploitation attempts. 7) Consider implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules tailored to detect and block XSS payloads targeting MaxAI Assistant endpoints. These measures, combined, will reduce the likelihood and impact of exploitation beyond generic advice.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- HCL
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-01T18:46:35.961Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68eb454c3a1a0b12de17ca04
Added to database: 10/12/2025, 6:06:04 AM
Last enriched: 10/19/2025, 6:27:18 AM
Last updated: 12/2/2025, 8:59:18 AM
Views: 71
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-10971: CWE-922 Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information in FERMAX ELECTRÓNICA S.A.U MeetMe
HighCVE-2025-13696: CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in softdiscover Zigaform – Price Calculator & Cost Estimation Form Builder Lite
MediumCVE-2025-11726: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in beaverbuilder Beaver Builder Page Builder – Drag and Drop Website Builder
MediumCVE-2025-13685: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in ays-pro Photo Gallery by Ays – Responsive Image Gallery
MediumCVE-2025-13140: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in devsoftbaltic SurveyJS: Drag & Drop WordPress Form Builder to create, style and embed multiple forms of any complexity
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.