CVE-2025-32324: Google Android · Elevation of Privilege
Affects Google AndroidSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.09% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Google Android | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
Organizations should monitor for official patches from Google addressing CVE-2025-32324 and apply them promptly once available. Until patches are released, it is advisable to restrict installation of untrusted applications and enforce strict app permission policies to limit local attacker capabilities. Employ mobile device management (MDM) solutions to control device configurations and monitor for suspicious activity related to activity launches. Developers and security teams should audit custom Android builds or OEM modifications for similar authorization issues in system command interfaces. Additionally, enabling runtime protections such as SELinux enforcing mode and leveraging Android's safety features can reduce exploitation risk. Regularly updating devices to supported Android versions and educating users about the risks of installing unknown apps will further mitigate exposure.
Description
In onCommand of ActivityManagerShellCommand.java, there is a possible arbitrary activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.