CVE-2025-32793: CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information in cilium cilium
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Versions 1.15.0 to 1.15.15, 1.16.0 to 1.16.8, and 1.17.0 to 1.17.2, are vulnerable when using Wireguard transparent encryption in a Cilium cluster, packets that originate from a terminating endpoint can leave the source node without encryption due to a race condition in how traffic is processed by Cilium. This issue has been patched in versions 1.15.16, 1.16.9, and 1.17.3. There are no workarounds available for this issue.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-32793 is a vulnerability affecting multiple versions of Cilium, a popular open-source networking, observability, and security solution that leverages eBPF technology for efficient dataplane operations. Specifically, the affected versions are from 1.15.0 up to 1.15.15, 1.16.0 up to 1.16.8, and 1.17.0 up to 1.17.2. The vulnerability arises when Cilium is configured to use Wireguard transparent encryption within a cluster. Due to a race condition in the way Cilium processes network traffic originating from terminating endpoints, packets can exit the source node without being encrypted as intended. This results in the cleartext transmission of potentially sensitive information over the network. The flaw is categorized under CWE-319, which pertains to the cleartext transmission of sensitive data, undermining confidentiality guarantees. The issue has been addressed in patched releases 1.15.16, 1.16.9, and 1.17.3. No workarounds are available, meaning that upgrading to a fixed version is the only effective remediation. There are no known exploits in the wild at this time, but the vulnerability poses a risk in environments relying on Wireguard transparent encryption for secure pod-to-pod or node-to-node communication. The race condition likely occurs during packet handling in the dataplane, causing a window where encryption is bypassed, exposing sensitive traffic to interception or eavesdropping within the cluster network or underlying infrastructure. Given Cilium's role in securing container networking, this vulnerability can compromise the confidentiality of intra-cluster communications, potentially leaking secrets, credentials, or sensitive application data.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those operating cloud-native environments or Kubernetes clusters using Cilium with Wireguard transparent encryption, this vulnerability can lead to significant confidentiality breaches. Sensitive data transmitted between microservices or nodes may be exposed to internal or external attackers with network access, undermining trust in the security posture of containerized applications. This could affect sectors with strict data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government. The exposure of cleartext traffic may facilitate lateral movement, data exfiltration, or compliance violations under GDPR and other regulations. Additionally, organizations relying on Cilium for network security may face operational disruptions if they must urgently patch or audit their environments. The absence of workarounds increases urgency and operational risk. While no exploits are currently known, the medium severity rating and the nature of the vulnerability suggest that motivated attackers with network access could exploit this flaw to intercept sensitive communications, especially in multi-tenant or hybrid cloud scenarios common in Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
The primary and only effective mitigation is to upgrade affected Cilium versions to the patched releases: 1.15.16, 1.16.9, or 1.17.3, depending on the version in use. Organizations should perform thorough inventory and version audits of their Cilium deployments to identify vulnerable instances. Given the lack of workarounds, patch management must be prioritized. Additionally, network segmentation and strict access controls should be enforced to limit network access to cluster nodes and reduce the risk of interception. Monitoring network traffic for unencrypted sensitive data flows may help detect exploitation attempts. Organizations should also review their use of Wireguard transparent encryption and consider alternative encryption configurations or additional encryption layers at the application level until patches are applied. Finally, integrating vulnerability scanning and automated compliance checks for Cilium versions in CI/CD pipelines can prevent deployment of vulnerable versions in the future.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Ireland, Belgium, Poland
CVE-2025-32793: CWE-319: Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information in cilium cilium
Description
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Versions 1.15.0 to 1.15.15, 1.16.0 to 1.16.8, and 1.17.0 to 1.17.2, are vulnerable when using Wireguard transparent encryption in a Cilium cluster, packets that originate from a terminating endpoint can leave the source node without encryption due to a race condition in how traffic is processed by Cilium. This issue has been patched in versions 1.15.16, 1.16.9, and 1.17.3. There are no workarounds available for this issue.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-32793 is a vulnerability affecting multiple versions of Cilium, a popular open-source networking, observability, and security solution that leverages eBPF technology for efficient dataplane operations. Specifically, the affected versions are from 1.15.0 up to 1.15.15, 1.16.0 up to 1.16.8, and 1.17.0 up to 1.17.2. The vulnerability arises when Cilium is configured to use Wireguard transparent encryption within a cluster. Due to a race condition in the way Cilium processes network traffic originating from terminating endpoints, packets can exit the source node without being encrypted as intended. This results in the cleartext transmission of potentially sensitive information over the network. The flaw is categorized under CWE-319, which pertains to the cleartext transmission of sensitive data, undermining confidentiality guarantees. The issue has been addressed in patched releases 1.15.16, 1.16.9, and 1.17.3. No workarounds are available, meaning that upgrading to a fixed version is the only effective remediation. There are no known exploits in the wild at this time, but the vulnerability poses a risk in environments relying on Wireguard transparent encryption for secure pod-to-pod or node-to-node communication. The race condition likely occurs during packet handling in the dataplane, causing a window where encryption is bypassed, exposing sensitive traffic to interception or eavesdropping within the cluster network or underlying infrastructure. Given Cilium's role in securing container networking, this vulnerability can compromise the confidentiality of intra-cluster communications, potentially leaking secrets, credentials, or sensitive application data.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those operating cloud-native environments or Kubernetes clusters using Cilium with Wireguard transparent encryption, this vulnerability can lead to significant confidentiality breaches. Sensitive data transmitted between microservices or nodes may be exposed to internal or external attackers with network access, undermining trust in the security posture of containerized applications. This could affect sectors with strict data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government. The exposure of cleartext traffic may facilitate lateral movement, data exfiltration, or compliance violations under GDPR and other regulations. Additionally, organizations relying on Cilium for network security may face operational disruptions if they must urgently patch or audit their environments. The absence of workarounds increases urgency and operational risk. While no exploits are currently known, the medium severity rating and the nature of the vulnerability suggest that motivated attackers with network access could exploit this flaw to intercept sensitive communications, especially in multi-tenant or hybrid cloud scenarios common in Europe.
Mitigation Recommendations
The primary and only effective mitigation is to upgrade affected Cilium versions to the patched releases: 1.15.16, 1.16.9, or 1.17.3, depending on the version in use. Organizations should perform thorough inventory and version audits of their Cilium deployments to identify vulnerable instances. Given the lack of workarounds, patch management must be prioritized. Additionally, network segmentation and strict access controls should be enforced to limit network access to cluster nodes and reduce the risk of interception. Monitoring network traffic for unencrypted sensitive data flows may help detect exploitation attempts. Organizations should also review their use of Wireguard transparent encryption and consider alternative encryption configurations or additional encryption layers at the application level until patches are applied. Finally, integrating vulnerability scanning and automated compliance checks for Cilium versions in CI/CD pipelines can prevent deployment of vulnerable versions in the future.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-10T12:51:12.281Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
Threat ID: 682d984bc4522896dcbf7bd7
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:31 AM
Last enriched: 6/21/2025, 2:39:15 PM
Last updated: 8/14/2025, 1:30:01 AM
Views: 18
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8142: CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in pencidesign Soledad
HighCVE-2025-8105: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in pencidesign Soledad
HighCVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.