CVE-2025-32800: CWE-1357: Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component in conda conda-build
Conda-build contains commands and tools to build conda packages. Prior to version 25.3.0, the pyproject.toml lists conda-index as a Python dependency. This package is not published in PyPI. An attacker could claim this namespace and upload arbitrary (malicious) code to the package, and then exploit pip install commands by injecting the malicious dependency in the solve. This issue has been fixed in version 25.3.0. A workaround involves using --no-deps for pip install-ing the project from the repository.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-32800 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting conda-build versions prior to 25.3.0. Conda-build is a toolset used to create conda packages, which are widely used in Python environments for managing software dependencies and environments. The vulnerability arises from the pyproject.toml file listing a dependency on a package named 'conda-index', which is not published on the official Python Package Index (PyPI). This creates a namespace confusion issue where an attacker can register the 'conda-index' package on PyPI and upload malicious code under this name. When a user runs 'pip install' commands that resolve dependencies including this package, the malicious code can be injected and executed during the installation process. This attack vector exploits the trust conda-build places on dependencies specified in pyproject.toml without verifying their authenticity or existence in trusted repositories. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, and can be triggered remotely by an attacker controlling the PyPI namespace. The issue has been addressed in conda-build version 25.3.0 by removing or correcting the dependency on the non-existent 'conda-index' package. As a temporary workaround, users can install the project using 'pip install' with the '--no-deps' flag to prevent automatic dependency resolution and installation, thereby avoiding the malicious package injection. The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.2 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability due to potential arbitrary code execution, combined with a network attack vector and no required privileges or user interaction. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the vulnerability presents a significant risk given the widespread use of conda-build in scientific, data science, and software development environments.
Potential Impact
European organizations relying on conda-build for package creation and environment management are at risk of supply chain attacks that can lead to arbitrary code execution on build systems. This can compromise the confidentiality of sensitive data, integrity of software packages, and availability of build pipelines. In sectors such as research institutions, financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure where Python and conda environments are prevalent, exploitation could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or disruption of automated deployment processes. The vulnerability's ability to inject malicious code during package installation means attackers could implant backdoors, exfiltrate data, or pivot within networks. Given the dependency on open-source package repositories, organizations with automated CI/CD pipelines that do not enforce strict dependency verification are particularly vulnerable. The impact is amplified in environments where conda-build is integrated into production workflows or used to distribute software internally or externally, potentially affecting downstream users and customers.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade conda-build to version 25.3.0 or later immediately to eliminate the vulnerable dependency on 'conda-index'. 2. Until upgrading, avoid using 'pip install' commands that automatically resolve dependencies; instead, use 'pip install --no-deps' when installing conda-build from source to prevent malicious dependency injection. 3. Implement strict dependency verification policies, including locking dependencies to known good versions and using tools that verify package signatures or hashes. 4. Monitor PyPI namespaces relevant to your environment for suspicious or unexpected package registrations, especially those matching internal or expected dependencies. 5. Integrate software supply chain security tools that scan for dependency confusion and namespace hijacking risks in CI/CD pipelines. 6. Educate development and DevOps teams about the risks of installing packages from untrusted sources and the importance of verifying dependencies. 7. Employ runtime monitoring and endpoint detection to identify anomalous behavior indicative of malicious code execution resulting from compromised package installations.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-32800: CWE-1357: Reliance on Insufficiently Trustworthy Component in conda conda-build
Description
Conda-build contains commands and tools to build conda packages. Prior to version 25.3.0, the pyproject.toml lists conda-index as a Python dependency. This package is not published in PyPI. An attacker could claim this namespace and upload arbitrary (malicious) code to the package, and then exploit pip install commands by injecting the malicious dependency in the solve. This issue has been fixed in version 25.3.0. A workaround involves using --no-deps for pip install-ing the project from the repository.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-32800 is a high-severity vulnerability affecting conda-build versions prior to 25.3.0. Conda-build is a toolset used to create conda packages, which are widely used in Python environments for managing software dependencies and environments. The vulnerability arises from the pyproject.toml file listing a dependency on a package named 'conda-index', which is not published on the official Python Package Index (PyPI). This creates a namespace confusion issue where an attacker can register the 'conda-index' package on PyPI and upload malicious code under this name. When a user runs 'pip install' commands that resolve dependencies including this package, the malicious code can be injected and executed during the installation process. This attack vector exploits the trust conda-build places on dependencies specified in pyproject.toml without verifying their authenticity or existence in trusted repositories. The vulnerability does not require authentication or user interaction, and can be triggered remotely by an attacker controlling the PyPI namespace. The issue has been addressed in conda-build version 25.3.0 by removing or correcting the dependency on the non-existent 'conda-index' package. As a temporary workaround, users can install the project using 'pip install' with the '--no-deps' flag to prevent automatic dependency resolution and installation, thereby avoiding the malicious package injection. The CVSS 4.0 score of 7.2 reflects the high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability due to potential arbitrary code execution, combined with a network attack vector and no required privileges or user interaction. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, but the vulnerability presents a significant risk given the widespread use of conda-build in scientific, data science, and software development environments.
Potential Impact
European organizations relying on conda-build for package creation and environment management are at risk of supply chain attacks that can lead to arbitrary code execution on build systems. This can compromise the confidentiality of sensitive data, integrity of software packages, and availability of build pipelines. In sectors such as research institutions, financial services, healthcare, and critical infrastructure where Python and conda environments are prevalent, exploitation could lead to unauthorized access, data breaches, or disruption of automated deployment processes. The vulnerability's ability to inject malicious code during package installation means attackers could implant backdoors, exfiltrate data, or pivot within networks. Given the dependency on open-source package repositories, organizations with automated CI/CD pipelines that do not enforce strict dependency verification are particularly vulnerable. The impact is amplified in environments where conda-build is integrated into production workflows or used to distribute software internally or externally, potentially affecting downstream users and customers.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Upgrade conda-build to version 25.3.0 or later immediately to eliminate the vulnerable dependency on 'conda-index'. 2. Until upgrading, avoid using 'pip install' commands that automatically resolve dependencies; instead, use 'pip install --no-deps' when installing conda-build from source to prevent malicious dependency injection. 3. Implement strict dependency verification policies, including locking dependencies to known good versions and using tools that verify package signatures or hashes. 4. Monitor PyPI namespaces relevant to your environment for suspicious or unexpected package registrations, especially those matching internal or expected dependencies. 5. Integrate software supply chain security tools that scan for dependency confusion and namespace hijacking risks in CI/CD pipelines. 6. Educate development and DevOps teams about the risks of installing packages from untrusted sources and the importance of verifying dependencies. 7. Employ runtime monitoring and endpoint detection to identify anomalous behavior indicative of malicious code execution resulting from compromised package installations.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- GitHub_M
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-10T12:51:12.282Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68508357a8c921274384a30e
Added to database: 6/16/2025, 8:49:27 PM
Last enriched: 6/16/2025, 9:04:31 PM
Last updated: 1/7/2026, 8:57:31 AM
Views: 52
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-15158: CWE-434 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in eastsidecode WP Enable WebP
HighCVE-2025-15018: CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in djanym Optional Email
CriticalCVE-2025-15000: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in tfrommen Page Keys
MediumCVE-2025-14999: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in kentothemes Latest Tabs
MediumCVE-2025-13531: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in hayyatapps Stylish Order Form Builder
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.