CVE-2025-3576: Use of Weak Hash
A vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos implementation allows GSSAPI-protected messages using RC4-HMAC-MD5 to be spoofed due to weaknesses in the MD5 checksum design. If RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption types, an attacker could exploit MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes. This may lead to unauthorized message tampering.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-3576 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the MIT Kerberos implementation used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10. The issue arises from the use of the RC4-HMAC-MD5 encryption type within GSSAPI-protected messages. Specifically, the vulnerability exploits weaknesses in the MD5 checksum algorithm, which is known to be susceptible to collision attacks. When RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption algorithms, an attacker can leverage MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes, effectively allowing unauthorized tampering of messages that are supposed to be protected by GSSAPI. This undermines the integrity of communications relying on Kerberos authentication, potentially enabling attackers to spoof messages without detection. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or availability directly but compromises message integrity. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.9, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and unchanged scope. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet. The vulnerability is significant because Kerberos is widely used for authentication in enterprise environments, and the use of deprecated cryptographic algorithms like RC4-HMAC-MD5 can expose organizations to message forgery attacks if fallback to weak encryption is allowed or preferred in configuration.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized modification of authentication or authorization messages within Kerberos-secured environments. This may result in privilege escalation or unauthorized access if attackers can successfully spoof messages to manipulate authentication flows. Organizations relying on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 with default or legacy Kerberos configurations that prefer RC4-HMAC-MD5 are particularly at risk. The impact is more pronounced in sectors with high reliance on Kerberos for identity management, such as government, finance, and critical infrastructure. Message integrity compromise can undermine trust in secure communications, potentially leading to data integrity issues and compliance violations under regulations like GDPR if unauthorized access or data manipulation occurs. However, since the vulnerability does not affect confidentiality or availability directly and requires the use of a weak encryption preference, the overall impact is medium but should not be underestimated in sensitive environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should audit their Kerberos configurations to ensure that RC4-HMAC-MD5 is not preferred or enabled. Specifically, they should: 1) Disable or remove support for RC4-HMAC-MD5 in Kerberos configuration files (e.g., krb5.conf) and enforce the use of stronger encryption types such as AES256 or AES128. 2) Apply any available patches or updates from Red Hat as soon as they are released to address this vulnerability. 3) Conduct network monitoring for anomalous Kerberos traffic that could indicate message tampering attempts. 4) Educate system administrators on the risks of legacy cryptographic algorithms and enforce cryptographic policy compliance. 5) Where possible, implement additional layers of message integrity verification or multi-factor authentication to reduce reliance on a single cryptographic mechanism. 6) Review and update incident response plans to include detection and response to Kerberos message forgery attempts. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration hardening, proactive monitoring, and operational readiness tailored to this specific vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland
CVE-2025-3576: Use of Weak Hash
Description
A vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos implementation allows GSSAPI-protected messages using RC4-HMAC-MD5 to be spoofed due to weaknesses in the MD5 checksum design. If RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption types, an attacker could exploit MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes. This may lead to unauthorized message tampering.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-3576 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the MIT Kerberos implementation used in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10. The issue arises from the use of the RC4-HMAC-MD5 encryption type within GSSAPI-protected messages. Specifically, the vulnerability exploits weaknesses in the MD5 checksum algorithm, which is known to be susceptible to collision attacks. When RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption algorithms, an attacker can leverage MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes, effectively allowing unauthorized tampering of messages that are supposed to be protected by GSSAPI. This undermines the integrity of communications relying on Kerberos authentication, potentially enabling attackers to spoof messages without detection. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or availability directly but compromises message integrity. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.9, reflecting a medium severity with network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and unchanged scope. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet. The vulnerability is significant because Kerberos is widely used for authentication in enterprise environments, and the use of deprecated cryptographic algorithms like RC4-HMAC-MD5 can expose organizations to message forgery attacks if fallback to weak encryption is allowed or preferred in configuration.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized modification of authentication or authorization messages within Kerberos-secured environments. This may result in privilege escalation or unauthorized access if attackers can successfully spoof messages to manipulate authentication flows. Organizations relying on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 with default or legacy Kerberos configurations that prefer RC4-HMAC-MD5 are particularly at risk. The impact is more pronounced in sectors with high reliance on Kerberos for identity management, such as government, finance, and critical infrastructure. Message integrity compromise can undermine trust in secure communications, potentially leading to data integrity issues and compliance violations under regulations like GDPR if unauthorized access or data manipulation occurs. However, since the vulnerability does not affect confidentiality or availability directly and requires the use of a weak encryption preference, the overall impact is medium but should not be underestimated in sensitive environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should audit their Kerberos configurations to ensure that RC4-HMAC-MD5 is not preferred or enabled. Specifically, they should: 1) Disable or remove support for RC4-HMAC-MD5 in Kerberos configuration files (e.g., krb5.conf) and enforce the use of stronger encryption types such as AES256 or AES128. 2) Apply any available patches or updates from Red Hat as soon as they are released to address this vulnerability. 3) Conduct network monitoring for anomalous Kerberos traffic that could indicate message tampering attempts. 4) Educate system administrators on the risks of legacy cryptographic algorithms and enforce cryptographic policy compliance. 5) Where possible, implement additional layers of message integrity verification or multi-factor authentication to reduce reliance on a single cryptographic mechanism. 6) Review and update incident response plans to include detection and response to Kerberos message forgery attempts. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on configuration hardening, proactive monitoring, and operational readiness tailored to this specific vulnerability.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- redhat
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-14T09:53:43.906Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682f2fb50acd01a24925c8e2
Added to database: 5/22/2025, 2:07:49 PM
Last enriched: 9/26/2025, 12:38:01 AM
Last updated: 9/26/2025, 12:38:01 AM
Views: 29
Related Threats
CVE-2025-55847: n/a
CriticalCVE-2025-45994: n/a
MediumCVE-2025-60164: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in NewsMAN NewsmanApp
HighCVE-2025-59844: CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in SonarSource sonarqube-scan-action
HighCVE-2025-11029: Cross-Site Request Forgery in givanz Vvveb
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.