CVE-2025-36092VulnerabilityPublished 3 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-36092: IBM Cloud Pak For Business Automation · Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input

Affects IBM Cloud Pak For Business AutomationSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 39% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
IBM Cloud Pak For Business Automation	Affected =25.0.0 =24.0.1 =24.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Monitor IBM’s official channels closely for patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-36092 and apply them promptly once available. 2. Restrict user privileges rigorously, ensuring that only trusted and necessary users have authenticated access to IBM Cloud Pak For Business Automation. 3. Implement input validation controls at the application and network layers to detect and block anomalous or excessively long input parameters that could trigger the vulnerability. 4. Employ rate limiting and anomaly detection on API endpoints to prevent abuse by authenticated users. 5. Conduct regular audits of user accounts and access logs to identify suspicious activities or potential credential compromise. 6. Develop and test incident response plans specifically for denial of service scenarios affecting business automation platforms. 7. Consider network segmentation to isolate critical automation services and reduce the blast radius of potential DoS attacks. 8. Educate administrators and users on the importance of credential security to mitigate insider threats or credential theft risks. 9. Use application-layer firewalls or web application firewalls (WAFs) capable of detecting unusual input patterns related to this vulnerability. 10. Engage with IBM support for guidance and potential workarounds until official patches are released.

Description

IBM Cloud Pak For Business Automation 25.0.0, 24.0.1, and 24.0.0 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to the improper validation of input length.

Impact

For European organizations relying on IBM Cloud Pak For Business Automation, this vulnerability poses a risk of service disruption through denial of service attacks initiated by authenticated users. Such disruptions can halt critical business automation workflows, impacting operational efficiency and potentially causing financial losses. Since the vulnerability affects availability only, confidentiality and integrity of data remain intact. However, the loss of availability in automation platforms can cascade into broader business process interruptions, especially in sectors like finance, manufacturing, and public services where automation is integral. The requirement for authentication reduces the attack surface but does not eliminate risk, particularly if insider threats or compromised credentials are factors. Organizations with large-scale deployments or those integrating IBM Cloud Pak deeply into their IT infrastructure face higher operational risks. Additionally, the lack of current exploits in the wild provides a window for proactive mitigation before exploitation becomes widespread.

CWE-1284Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input (opens in a new tab)
Base weakness
The product receives input that is expected to specify a quantity (such as size or length), but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the quantity has the required properties.
Implementation · Input Validation
Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

ibm.com/support/pages/node/7249999 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Nov 2025, 15:30 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-1284

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats