Skip to main content
CVE-2025-3660VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-3660: Petlibrio Smart Pet Feeder Platform · Improper Authorization of Index Containing Sensitive Information

Affects Petlibrio Smart Pet Feeder PlatformSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
6.9Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 11% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 3 Jan 2026

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
PetlibrioSmart Pet Feeder PlatformAffected
  • <=1.7.31
Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Until a patch is available, restrict access to the affected API endpoint and monitor for suspicious activity involving arbitrary pet ID requests. Implementing proper ownership verification on the server side is necessary to remediate this issue.

Description

Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to access other users' pet data by exploiting missing ownership verification. Attackers can send requests to /member/pet/detailV2 with arbitrary pet IDs to retrieve sensitive information including pet details, member IDs, and avatar URLs without proper authorization checks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…