CVE-2025-37131VulnerabilityPublished 16 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-37131: Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateway · Vulnerability

Affects Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN GatewaySource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.9 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable component that could affect component-wide settings and files.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) HPE Aruba Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateway	Affected =9.5.0.0 =9.4.0.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations using affected versions of HPE Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateway should implement the following specific mitigations: 1) Restrict and monitor administrative access rigorously, employing strong multi-factor authentication and least privilege principles to reduce the risk of credential compromise. 2) Conduct thorough audits of existing admin accounts and remove or disable any unnecessary or dormant accounts. 3) Implement network segmentation and access controls to limit the exposure of the SD-WAN management interfaces to trusted networks and personnel only. 4) Monitor system logs and file access patterns for unusual activity that could indicate attempts to access sensitive files. 5) Engage with HPE support channels to obtain any forthcoming patches or workarounds and apply them promptly once available. 6) Consider deploying additional endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions to detect potential insider threat behaviors. 7) Regularly back up configuration and system files securely to enable recovery in case of compromise. These targeted actions go beyond generic advice by focusing on reducing the likelihood that an attacker can obtain or misuse administrative credentials and by enhancing detection capabilities around sensitive file access.

Description

A vulnerability in EdgeConnect SD-WAN ECOS could allow an authenticated remote threat actor with admin privileges to access sensitive unauthorized system files. Under certain conditions, this could lead to exposure and exfiltration of sensitive information.

Impact

For European organizations, especially those relying on HPE Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN solutions to manage critical network infrastructure, this vulnerability poses a risk of sensitive data exposure. Compromise of system files could reveal configuration details, encryption keys, or credentials that attackers could use to escalate privileges or move laterally within the network. This is particularly concerning for sectors with stringent data protection requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government, where unauthorized disclosure could lead to regulatory penalties under GDPR and damage to reputation. Since SD-WAN gateways often serve as central points for network traffic routing and security enforcement, exploitation could undermine network segmentation and monitoring controls. However, the prerequisite of administrative credentials reduces the likelihood of external attackers exploiting this vulnerability directly, shifting the threat primarily towards insider threats or attackers who have already gained privileged access. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently limits immediate risk but does not preclude future exploitation attempts.

CWE-284Improper Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Pillar weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #19OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.
MITRE discourages mapping vulnerabilities to this broad entry; the root cause is usually a more specific weakness.
Architecture and Design · Operation
Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Architecture and Design · Separation of Privilege
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Docker Security (opens in a new tab)
Third Party Javascript Management (opens in a new tab)
Virtual Patching (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V1.4.5 (opens in a new tab)
V1.10.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Embedding Scripts within Scripts (opens in a new tab)
Modification of Windows Service Configuration (opens in a new tab)
Malicious Root Certificate (opens in a new tab)
Intent Spoof (opens in a new tab)
WebView Exposure (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docId=hpesbnw04943en_us&docLocale=en_US (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 24 Sep 2025, 01:15 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-284

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats