CVE-2025-4053: CWE-312 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in Be-Tech Mifare Classic cards
The data stored in Be-Tech Mifare Classic card is stored in cleartext. An attacker having access to a Be-Tech hotel guest Mifare Classic card can create a master key card that unlocks all the locks in the building. This issue affects all Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems. To fix the vulnerability, it is necessary to replace the software, encoder, cards, and PCBs in the locks.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-4053 is a vulnerability affecting Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems, specifically used in hotel guest access control. The core issue is the cleartext storage of sensitive information on the cards, classified under CWE-312 (Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information). Because the data on these cards is not encrypted or otherwise protected, an attacker who gains physical access to a single Be-Tech Mifare Classic card can extract the stored data and use it to create a master key card. This master key card can then unlock all locks within the building that rely on the same system, effectively bypassing all access controls. The vulnerability affects all versions of the Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems, indicating a systemic design flaw rather than a patchable software bug. Remediation requires a comprehensive replacement of the entire system, including software, card encoders, the cards themselves, and the printed circuit boards (PCBs) in the locks. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.8 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is physical (AV:P), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and low privileges (PR:L). The vulnerability impacts confidentiality and integrity highly, as unauthorized access compromises both. There are no known exploits in the wild yet, but the potential for physical cloning attacks is significant given the nature of the vulnerability. This vulnerability highlights the risks of relying on legacy or weak RFID card technologies without encryption or secure storage mechanisms.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those in the hospitality sector using Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems, this vulnerability poses a significant risk of unauthorized physical access. An attacker with temporary access to a single guest card could clone it to gain master access, compromising guest safety, privacy, and property security. This could lead to theft, unauthorized surveillance, or reputational damage. Beyond hotels, any facility using these cards for access control (e.g., offices, residential buildings) is at risk. The breach of physical security can also have cascading effects on IT systems if physical access leads to network or server room entry. The medium CVSS score reflects the physical access requirement, but the impact on confidentiality and integrity is high. European data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) may also be implicated if unauthorized access leads to personal data exposure. The need to replace hardware and software components implies significant operational disruption and financial cost for affected organizations.
Mitigation Recommendations
Mitigation requires a full system upgrade: replacing the Be-Tech Mifare Classic cards with more secure alternatives that implement strong encryption and secure key storage, such as Mifare DESFire or other modern RFID technologies. The lock PCBs and software must also be updated or replaced to support secure authentication protocols. Organizations should conduct an inventory audit to identify all affected systems and plan phased replacements to minimize disruption. Until replacement, physical security controls should be enhanced to prevent unauthorized card access, such as stricter card issuance and return policies, surveillance, and staff training. Additionally, monitoring for suspicious access patterns can help detect potential misuse. Vendors and integrators should be engaged to ensure secure configuration and deployment of new systems. Finally, organizations should review and update their incident response plans to address potential physical access breaches stemming from this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Austria, Switzerland
CVE-2025-4053: CWE-312 Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information in Be-Tech Mifare Classic cards
Description
The data stored in Be-Tech Mifare Classic card is stored in cleartext. An attacker having access to a Be-Tech hotel guest Mifare Classic card can create a master key card that unlocks all the locks in the building. This issue affects all Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems. To fix the vulnerability, it is necessary to replace the software, encoder, cards, and PCBs in the locks.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-4053 is a vulnerability affecting Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems, specifically used in hotel guest access control. The core issue is the cleartext storage of sensitive information on the cards, classified under CWE-312 (Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information). Because the data on these cards is not encrypted or otherwise protected, an attacker who gains physical access to a single Be-Tech Mifare Classic card can extract the stored data and use it to create a master key card. This master key card can then unlock all locks within the building that rely on the same system, effectively bypassing all access controls. The vulnerability affects all versions of the Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems, indicating a systemic design flaw rather than a patchable software bug. Remediation requires a comprehensive replacement of the entire system, including software, card encoders, the cards themselves, and the printed circuit boards (PCBs) in the locks. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.8 (medium severity), reflecting that the attack vector is physical (AV:P), requires low attack complexity (AC:L), no user interaction (UI:N), and low privileges (PR:L). The vulnerability impacts confidentiality and integrity highly, as unauthorized access compromises both. There are no known exploits in the wild yet, but the potential for physical cloning attacks is significant given the nature of the vulnerability. This vulnerability highlights the risks of relying on legacy or weak RFID card technologies without encryption or secure storage mechanisms.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those in the hospitality sector using Be-Tech Mifare Classic card systems, this vulnerability poses a significant risk of unauthorized physical access. An attacker with temporary access to a single guest card could clone it to gain master access, compromising guest safety, privacy, and property security. This could lead to theft, unauthorized surveillance, or reputational damage. Beyond hotels, any facility using these cards for access control (e.g., offices, residential buildings) is at risk. The breach of physical security can also have cascading effects on IT systems if physical access leads to network or server room entry. The medium CVSS score reflects the physical access requirement, but the impact on confidentiality and integrity is high. European data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) may also be implicated if unauthorized access leads to personal data exposure. The need to replace hardware and software components implies significant operational disruption and financial cost for affected organizations.
Mitigation Recommendations
Mitigation requires a full system upgrade: replacing the Be-Tech Mifare Classic cards with more secure alternatives that implement strong encryption and secure key storage, such as Mifare DESFire or other modern RFID technologies. The lock PCBs and software must also be updated or replaced to support secure authentication protocols. Organizations should conduct an inventory audit to identify all affected systems and plan phased replacements to minimize disruption. Until replacement, physical security controls should be enhanced to prevent unauthorized card access, such as stricter card issuance and return policies, surveillance, and staff training. Additionally, monitoring for suspicious access patterns can help detect potential misuse. Vendors and integrators should be engaged to ensure secure configuration and deployment of new systems. Finally, organizations should review and update their incident response plans to address potential physical access breaches stemming from this vulnerability.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- CERT-PL
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-28T21:08:42.323Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 683440d80acd01a249285565
Added to database: 5/26/2025, 10:22:16 AM
Last enriched: 7/9/2025, 2:10:15 PM
Last updated: 1/7/2026, 6:10:57 AM
Views: 80
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-14835: CWE-80 Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) in opajaap WP Photo Album Plus
HighCVE-2026-0650: CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function in OpenFlagr Flagr
CriticalCVE-2025-15474: CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in AuntyFey AuntyFey Smart Combination Lock
MediumCVE-2025-14468: CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in mohammed_kaludi AMP for WP – Accelerated Mobile Pages
MediumCVE-2025-9611: CWE-749 Exposed Dangerous Method or Function in Microsoft Playwright
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.