VulnerabilityPublished 16 Jul 2025Updated 4 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-40923: MIYAGAWA Plack::Middleware::Session · Generation of Predictable Numbers or Identifiers

Affects MIYAGAWA Plack::Middleware::SessionSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.3 High · fixed in 0.35 : patch MIYAGAWA Plack::Middleware::Session soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.3High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 32% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 0.35

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 16 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

cwe-338

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
MIYAGAWA Plack::Middleware::Session	Affected =0.01	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

The primary mitigation is to upgrade Plack::Middleware::Session to version 0.35 or later, where the session ID generation uses a cryptographically secure random number generator, eliminating predictability. Organizations should audit their Perl web applications to identify usage of the vulnerable middleware version and prioritize patching. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider implementing compensating controls such as: enforcing strict session expiration and rotation policies to limit the window of token validity; monitoring session activity for anomalies indicative of hijacking attempts; restricting session access by IP address or device fingerprinting to reduce the risk of token misuse; disabling or filtering HTTP headers that leak epoch time information, such as the Date header, to reduce predictability; and employing web application firewalls (WAFs) to detect and block suspicious session-related requests. Additionally, developers should review session management practices to ensure adherence to cryptographic best practices and avoid reliance on insecure random number generators. Regular security assessments and penetration testing focused on session management can help detect residual weaknesses.

Description

Plack-Middleware-Session before version 0.35 for Perl generates session ids insecurely. The default session id generator returns a SHA-1 hash seeded with the built-in rand function, the epoch time, and the PID. The PID will come from a small set of numbers, and the epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage. Predicable session ids could allow an attacker to gain access to systems.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a substantial risk to web applications that rely on Plack::Middleware::Session for session management, particularly those using affected versions prior to 0.35. Successful exploitation can lead to session hijacking, allowing attackers to impersonate legitimate users, access sensitive data, or perform unauthorized actions. This can compromise confidentiality and integrity of user data and disrupt availability if attackers manipulate sessions to cause denial of service. Sectors such as finance, healthcare, e-commerce, and government services, which often handle sensitive personal and financial information, are particularly vulnerable. The predictability of session IDs increases the attack surface for automated attacks and targeted intrusions. Additionally, the vulnerability could facilitate lateral movement within networks if session tokens grant access to internal systems. Given the widespread use of Perl in legacy and modern web applications across Europe, organizations that have not updated this middleware are at risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window of opportunity for proactive mitigation before widespread attacks occur.

CWE-340Generation of Predictable Numbers or Identifiers (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A04:2025: Cryptographic Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product uses a scheme that generates numbers or identifiers that are more predictable than required.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Forgot Password (opens in a new tab)
Transport Layer Protection (opens in a new tab)
User Privacy Protection (opens in a new tab)
Password Storage (opens in a new tab)
Cryptographic Storage (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V2.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V2.6.2 (opens in a new tab)
V2.7.6 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Nov 2025, 21:48 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-340

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats