Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-40934: CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in TIMLEGGE XML::Sig

0
High
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-40934cvecve-2025-40934cwe-347
Published: Wed Nov 26 2025 (11/26/2025, 22:34:33 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: TIMLEGGE
Product: XML::Sig

Description

CVE-2025-40934 is a vulnerability in the TIMLEGGE XML::Sig Perl module versions 0. 27 through 0. 67, where the module improperly verifies cryptographic signatures on XML files. Specifically, if the XML document lacks a signature, the module incorrectly validates it as authentic instead of returning an error. This flaw allows an attacker to remove or omit the signature from an XML document and still have it pass signature verification, effectively bypassing signature validation. This vulnerability can lead to acceptance of unsigned or tampered XML data, undermining the integrity and authenticity guarantees expected from XML signatures. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no CVSS score has been assigned. European organizations using affected versions of XML::Sig in their systems that rely on XML signature validation are at risk of accepting forged or altered XML data. Mitigation requires updating to a fixed version once available or implementing additional signature presence checks outside the vulnerable module. Countries with significant Perl usage in critical infrastructure or software development, such as Germany, the UK, and France, are more likely to be impacted.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/26/2025, 23:10:24 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-40934 is a cryptographic signature verification vulnerability in the TIMLEGGE XML::Sig Perl module, affecting versions 0.27 through 0.67. XML::Sig is designed to validate digital signatures on XML documents to ensure their authenticity and integrity. However, due to improper verification logic (CWE-347), the module erroneously returns a successful validation result when the XML document contains no signature at all. This means that an attacker can remove the signature element from an XML file and still have the file accepted as valid by the module. The root cause lies in the module's failure to check for the presence of a signature before validating it, leading to a false positive validation outcome. This flaw undermines the fundamental security guarantees of XML signatures, allowing unsigned or maliciously altered XML data to be treated as trustworthy. The vulnerability affects a range of XML::Sig versions from 0.27 to 0.67, with no patch currently available or linked. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability is publicly disclosed and documented in the CVE database. The lack of a CVSS score necessitates an independent severity assessment based on impact and exploitability factors. Because XML signatures are often used in secure communications, document signing, and configuration management, this vulnerability could have serious consequences if exploited in environments relying on XML::Sig for security validation.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to the integrity and authenticity of XML-based communications and data exchanges. Systems that rely on XML::Sig for verifying signed XML documents—such as financial transaction processing, electronic invoicing (e.g., PEPPOL networks), government document workflows, and secure configuration management—may inadvertently accept unsigned or tampered XML files. This can lead to unauthorized data manipulation, fraud, or injection of malicious configurations. The impact is particularly critical in sectors with stringent data integrity requirements, including banking, healthcare, public administration, and critical infrastructure. Since the vulnerability allows bypassing signature verification without authentication or user interaction, attackers with the ability to intercept or modify XML documents in transit or at rest can exploit this flaw to compromise system trustworthiness. The absence of known exploits suggests a window for proactive mitigation, but also means organizations may be unaware of the risk. The vulnerability could also affect software vendors and developers in Europe who package or distribute affected XML::Sig versions, potentially propagating the risk downstream.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately audit their use of the TIMLEGGE XML::Sig Perl module to identify affected versions (0.27 through 0.67). Until a patched version is released, implement the following mitigations: 1) Introduce explicit checks in application code to verify the presence of a signature element before invoking XML::Sig validation, rejecting any XML documents lacking signatures. 2) Employ additional cryptographic verification layers or external signature validation tools that correctly enforce signature presence and validity. 3) Monitor XML processing logs for anomalies such as unsigned documents being accepted. 4) Restrict access and modification rights to XML documents to reduce the risk of tampering. 5) Engage with the vendor or open-source maintainers to obtain or contribute patches that fix the signature presence verification logic. 6) Educate developers and system integrators about the vulnerability to avoid deploying vulnerable versions in new projects. 7) For critical systems, consider isolating or sandboxing XML processing components to limit impact if exploited. These targeted mitigations go beyond generic advice by focusing on the specific failure mode of signature absence acceptance.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.2
Assigner Short Name
CPANSec
Date Reserved
2025-04-16T09:05:34.363Z
Cvss Version
null
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 69278547d322a87b22e58f14

Added to database: 11/26/2025, 10:55:03 PM

Last enriched: 11/26/2025, 11:10:24 PM

Last updated: 11/27/2025, 12:01:05 AM

Views: 4

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats