VulnerabilityPublished 30 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-41095: GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S.L (GPS) BOLD Workplanner · Insecure Direct Object Reference

Affects GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S.L (GPS) BOLD WorkplannerSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.1 High · fixed in 2.5.25 : patch GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S.L (GPS) BOLD Workplanner soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

7.1High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 17% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.5.25

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S.L (GPS) BOLD Workplanner	Affected =2.5.24	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations using BOLD Workplanner should immediately verify their software version and plan to upgrade to version 2.5.25 or later once available, as this version addresses the vulnerability. In the interim, organizations should implement strict server-side authorization checks to validate user permissions against requested internal identifiers, ensuring that users cannot access data outside their scope. Conduct thorough access control reviews and enforce the principle of least privilege for all authenticated users. Monitor application logs for anomalous access patterns, such as requests for planning counters outside a user's normal scope or repeated access attempts to unauthorized resources. Employ multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Additionally, consider network segmentation to limit access to the planning tool to trusted users and systems. Security teams should prepare incident response plans to quickly address any detected exploitation attempts. Finally, engage with the vendor for timely updates and patches, and participate in information sharing forums to stay informed about emerging threats related to this vulnerability.

Description

CVE-2025-41095 is a high-severity Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in GLOBAL PLANNING SOLUTIONS S. L's BOLD Workplanner versions prior to 2.5.25. It allows authenticated users to bypass authorization controls by manipulating user-controlled keys to access unauthorized planning counter details. Exploitation requires no user interaction and no elevated privileges beyond authentication. The vulnerability stems from inadequate validation of user input related to internal identifiers. Although no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability poses a significant risk to confidentiality due to unauthorized data access. European organizations using affected versions should prioritize patching and implement strict access control validation. Countries with higher adoption of GPS BOLD Workplanner, especially those with critical planning operations, are at greater risk.

Impact

For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-41095 is unauthorized disclosure of sensitive planning data, which can compromise confidentiality. This could affect operational security, competitive positioning, and compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR if personal or sensitive data is involved. Unauthorized access to planning counters may allow attackers or malicious insiders to glean insights into resource allocation, scheduling, or strategic initiatives, potentially leading to industrial espionage or operational disruption. Although the vulnerability does not directly impact system integrity or availability, the exposure of sensitive information can have cascading effects on trust, regulatory compliance, and business continuity. Organizations in sectors relying heavily on detailed planning tools—such as manufacturing, logistics, utilities, and critical infrastructure—may face heightened risks. Furthermore, the requirement for authentication means that insider threats or compromised credentials could be leveraged to exploit this vulnerability. The absence of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, but the high CVSS score and straightforward exploitation path necessitate proactive mitigation to prevent future attacks.

CWE-639Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #24OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
Architecture and Design
For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design
Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Access Control (opens in a new tab)
Authorization Testing Automation (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Insecure Direct Object Reference Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V4.1.2 (opens in a new tab)
V4.2.1 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/insecure-direct-object-reference-gps-bold-workplanner (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 7 Oct 2025, 11:27 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-639

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats