CVE-2025-41418VulnerabilityPublished 27 Jun 2025Updated 30 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-41418: TB-eye XRN-410SN/TE · Buffer Overflow

Affects TB-eye XRN-410SN/TESource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 30% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 27 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
TB-eye Ltd. XRN-410SN/TE	Affected <=2.47	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

European organizations should immediately inventory their TB-eye XRN-410SN/TE devices and verify firmware versions. Devices running firmware versions Ver2.47b_220119153805 or earlier should be prioritized for firmware updates once TB-eye Ltd. releases a patch addressing this vulnerability. Until patches are available, organizations should restrict network access to these devices by implementing network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure to trusted management networks only. Disabling unnecessary CGI services or restricting access to the CGI interface via IP whitelisting can reduce attack surface. Continuous monitoring of device logs and network traffic for abnormal CGI process terminations or unusual requests can help detect attempted exploitation. Additionally, organizations should engage with TB-eye Ltd. support channels to obtain official patches and advisories. Regularly updating device firmware and applying security best practices for IoT and networked surveillance devices will further reduce risk.

Description

Buffer Overflow vulnerability exists in multiple versions of TB-eye network recorders and AHD recorders. The CGI process may be terminated abnormally by processing a specially crafted request.

Impact

For European organizations using TB-eye Ltd.'s XRN-410SN/TE network recorders or AHD recorders, this vulnerability could lead to denial of service conditions on affected devices. Since these devices are typically used for video surveillance and security monitoring, an attacker could disrupt video recording or live monitoring by triggering the buffer overflow, causing the CGI process to crash. This disruption could impair security operations, delay incident response, and reduce situational awareness. While the vulnerability does not allow for data theft or manipulation, the loss of availability in security infrastructure can have serious operational consequences, especially in critical infrastructure, transportation hubs, or public safety environments. The lack of authentication or user interaction required for exploitation increases the risk of remote attacks, particularly if these devices are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet. However, the medium severity and absence of known exploits suggest that the threat is moderate but should not be ignored.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Jun 2025, 19:09 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats