CVE-2025-41439VulnerabilityPublished 30 Jun 2025

CVE-2025-41439: RICOH Streamline NX · Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

Affects RICOH Streamline NXSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 08:11 UTC

CVSS 3.0 base score

6.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 12% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 30 Jun 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Ricoh Company, Ltd. RICOH Streamline NX	Affected >=3.5.0 <=3.7.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Organizations should prioritize updating RICOH Streamline NX to versions beyond 3.7.2 once patches are released by Ricoh. In the interim, implement strict input validation and output encoding on all parameters within the SLNX Help Documentation interface to neutralize malicious scripts. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in browsers accessing the application. Educate users to recognize suspicious URLs and phishing attempts that might exploit this vulnerability. Network-level controls such as Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can be configured to detect and block typical XSS payloads targeting the vulnerable parameter. Additionally, monitor logs for unusual access patterns or repeated attempts to inject scripts. If feasible, restrict access to the help documentation interface to trusted internal networks or authenticated users only, reducing exposure. Finally, coordinate with Ricoh support channels to obtain official patches or recommended workarounds promptly.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability via a specific parameter exists in SLNX Help Documentation of RICOH Streamline NX. If this vulnerability is exploited, an arbitrary script may be executed in the web browser of the user who accessed the product.

Impact

For European organizations using RICOH Streamline NX versions 3.5.0 to 3.7.2, this vulnerability poses a risk of client-side script injection leading to potential credential theft, session hijacking, or unauthorized actions performed via the victim's browser. Since RICOH Streamline NX is often used in document management and workflow automation, exploitation could compromise sensitive business documents or internal workflows. The reflected XSS could be leveraged in targeted phishing campaigns against employees, increasing the risk of lateral movement or data exfiltration. Although the vulnerability does not directly impact system availability, the compromise of user sessions or credentials could lead to broader security incidents. European organizations with strict data protection regulations (e.g., GDPR) must consider the reputational and compliance risks associated with such client-side attacks, especially if personal data is exposed or misused. The medium severity rating indicates that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should not be ignored due to the potential for exploitation in social engineering contexts.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 30 Jun 2025, 09:54 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats