CVE-2025-47295: Denial of service in Fortinet FortiOS
A buffer over-read in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, and versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.14 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash the FGFM daemon via a specially crafted request, under rare conditions that are outside of the attacker's control.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-47295 is a buffer over-read vulnerability identified in Fortinet's FortiOS operating system, specifically affecting versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, and 6.4.0. The vulnerability resides in the FGFM (FortiGate to FortiManager) daemon, which is responsible for communication between FortiGate devices and FortiManager management servers. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted request that triggers a buffer over-read condition, leading to a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the FGFM daemon. The conditions required to exploit this vulnerability are rare and outside the attacker's control, which reduces the likelihood of successful exploitation. The vulnerability does not allow for confidentiality or integrity compromise, nor does it provide a means for code execution or privilege escalation. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 3.4, indicating a low severity level, with attack vector being network-based but requiring high attack complexity and no privileges or user interaction. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no patches or mitigations have been explicitly linked in the provided data. This vulnerability primarily impacts availability by causing service disruption on affected FortiOS devices, potentially interrupting network security management and monitoring functions.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily related to availability disruptions in network security infrastructure. FortiOS is widely used in enterprise and service provider environments for firewalling, VPN, and centralized management via FortiManager. A denial of service on the FGFM daemon could disrupt communication between FortiGate devices and FortiManager, impairing centralized management, logging, and policy deployment. This could delay incident response and security operations, especially in large-scale deployments. However, since exploitation requires rare conditions and does not allow for data compromise or persistent control, the overall risk to confidentiality and integrity is minimal. Organizations relying heavily on Fortinet infrastructure for critical network security may experience temporary outages or degraded security posture during an attack or attempted exploitation. The low CVSS score reflects the limited impact and complexity of exploitation, but organizations should remain vigilant given the critical role of FortiOS in network defense.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor Fortinet advisories closely for official patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-47295 and apply them promptly once available. 2. Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of FortiOS management interfaces, especially the FGFM daemon, to untrusted networks or the internet. 3. Restrict access to FortiManager and FortiGate management interfaces via firewall rules and VPNs to trusted administrators only. 4. Enable and monitor logging and alerting for unusual FGFM daemon crashes or restarts to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 5. Conduct regular backups of FortiOS configurations and FortiManager data to enable rapid recovery in case of service disruption. 6. Consider deploying redundancy or high availability configurations for FortiManager and FortiGate devices to minimize impact of potential DoS events. 7. Review and harden FortiOS configurations to minimize attack surface, including disabling unused services and interfaces. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on limiting attack surface, early detection, and operational resilience specific to FortiOS and FGFM daemon.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Sweden
CVE-2025-47295: Denial of service in Fortinet FortiOS
Description
A buffer over-read in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, and versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.14 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash the FGFM daemon via a specially crafted request, under rare conditions that are outside of the attacker's control.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-47295 is a buffer over-read vulnerability identified in Fortinet's FortiOS operating system, specifically affecting versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, and 6.4.0. The vulnerability resides in the FGFM (FortiGate to FortiManager) daemon, which is responsible for communication between FortiGate devices and FortiManager management servers. A remote unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted request that triggers a buffer over-read condition, leading to a denial of service (DoS) by crashing the FGFM daemon. The conditions required to exploit this vulnerability are rare and outside the attacker's control, which reduces the likelihood of successful exploitation. The vulnerability does not allow for confidentiality or integrity compromise, nor does it provide a means for code execution or privilege escalation. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 3.4, indicating a low severity level, with attack vector being network-based but requiring high attack complexity and no privileges or user interaction. There are no known exploits in the wild at the time of publication, and no patches or mitigations have been explicitly linked in the provided data. This vulnerability primarily impacts availability by causing service disruption on affected FortiOS devices, potentially interrupting network security management and monitoring functions.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is primarily related to availability disruptions in network security infrastructure. FortiOS is widely used in enterprise and service provider environments for firewalling, VPN, and centralized management via FortiManager. A denial of service on the FGFM daemon could disrupt communication between FortiGate devices and FortiManager, impairing centralized management, logging, and policy deployment. This could delay incident response and security operations, especially in large-scale deployments. However, since exploitation requires rare conditions and does not allow for data compromise or persistent control, the overall risk to confidentiality and integrity is minimal. Organizations relying heavily on Fortinet infrastructure for critical network security may experience temporary outages or degraded security posture during an attack or attempted exploitation. The low CVSS score reflects the limited impact and complexity of exploitation, but organizations should remain vigilant given the critical role of FortiOS in network defense.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor Fortinet advisories closely for official patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-47295 and apply them promptly once available. 2. Implement network segmentation to limit exposure of FortiOS management interfaces, especially the FGFM daemon, to untrusted networks or the internet. 3. Restrict access to FortiManager and FortiGate management interfaces via firewall rules and VPNs to trusted administrators only. 4. Enable and monitor logging and alerting for unusual FGFM daemon crashes or restarts to detect potential exploitation attempts early. 5. Conduct regular backups of FortiOS configurations and FortiManager data to enable rapid recovery in case of service disruption. 6. Consider deploying redundancy or high availability configurations for FortiManager and FortiGate devices to minimize impact of potential DoS events. 7. Review and harden FortiOS configurations to minimize attack surface, including disabling unused services and interfaces. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on limiting attack surface, early detection, and operational resilience specific to FortiOS and FGFM daemon.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- fortinet
- Date Reserved
- 2025-05-05T20:10:32.083Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6836c26c182aa0cae23d6c48
Added to database: 5/28/2025, 7:59:40 AM
Last enriched: 7/6/2025, 1:13:01 AM
Last updated: 8/18/2025, 1:02:16 PM
Views: 35
Related Threats
CVE-2025-55283: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in aiven aiven-db-migrate
CriticalCVE-2025-55282: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in aiven aiven-db-migrate
CriticalCVE-2025-54234: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918) in Adobe ColdFusion
LowCVE-2025-3639: CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in Liferay Portal
LowCVE-2025-55288: CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in MGeurts genealogy
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.