CVE-2025-48628: Google Android · Information Disclosure
Affects Google AndroidSource CVE Database V5
Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.
Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC
- EPSS
- 0.08% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 0% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HExploitation evidence
Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 8 Dec 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors
A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.
What to do
Affected software
| Product | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| Google Android | Affected
| Fixed in– |
AI-suggested
Organizations should monitor for official patches from Google and apply them promptly once released to address this vulnerability. Until patches are available, enforcing strict access controls to limit local user privileges can reduce exploitation risk. Specifically, restricting unnecessary local user accounts and employing device management policies to control app permissions related to printing services can help. Additionally, auditing and monitoring local access logs for suspicious activity may detect exploitation attempts early. Employing endpoint security solutions capable of detecting anomalous privilege escalation behaviors on Android devices is recommended. For environments with sensitive data, consider disabling or restricting printing services where feasible. Educating users about the risks of local privilege escalation and enforcing strong device lock mechanisms can further mitigate exposure.
Description
In validateIconUserBoundary of PrintManagerService.java, there is a possible cross-user image leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.