CVE-2025-48710: CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') in kro.run kro
kro (Kube Resource Orchestrator) 0.1.0 before 0.2.1 allows users (with permission to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources) to supply arbitrary container images. This can lead to a confused-deputy scenario where kro's controllers deploy and run attacker-controlled images, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution on cluster nodes.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-48710 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting kro (Kube Resource Orchestrator) version 0.1.0, prior to 0.2.1. The vulnerability arises from a confused deputy scenario (CWE-441) where users with permissions to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources can supply arbitrary container images. Kro's controllers, which have elevated privileges, then deploy and run these attacker-controlled container images on cluster nodes. This results in unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) on the nodes hosting the Kubernetes clusters managed by kro. The vulnerability exploits the trust relationship between the user and the controller component, where the controller acts as a privileged intermediary. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.1, reflecting a network attack vector with low attack complexity but requiring high privileges (PR:H) and no user interaction. The scope is changed (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. The impact is limited to integrity (I:L) with no direct confidentiality or availability impact. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet. The vulnerability is significant because it allows an attacker with certain permissions to escalate their capabilities to execute arbitrary code on cluster nodes without authentication, potentially compromising the entire Kubernetes environment managed by kro. This can lead to further lateral movement, data manipulation, or persistent backdoors within the cluster infrastructure.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those leveraging Kubernetes orchestration platforms like kro, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized code execution on critical infrastructure nodes. Compromise of cluster nodes can lead to manipulation or disruption of containerized applications, data breaches, and loss of integrity in business-critical services. Given the increasing adoption of Kubernetes in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing across Europe, exploitation could disrupt operations and violate compliance requirements like GDPR if data integrity or availability is impacted indirectly. The requirement for high privileges to exploit somewhat limits the threat to insiders or compromised accounts, but insider threats or privilege escalation attacks could leverage this vulnerability to gain full control over cluster nodes. The lack of user interaction needed means automated exploitation is possible once privileges are obtained. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in supply chain attacks if attackers compromise users with the required permissions. Overall, the impact is moderate but with potential for significant operational disruption in sensitive environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict permissions strictly: Limit the ability to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources to only highly trusted administrators. Implement least privilege principles rigorously. 2. Monitor and audit: Continuously monitor Kubernetes audit logs for creation or modification of ResourceGraphDefinition resources and unexpected container image deployments. 3. Use admission controllers: Deploy Kubernetes admission controllers or policy engines (e.g., OPA Gatekeeper) to validate and restrict container images that can be used in ResourceGraphDefinition resources, blocking untrusted or unsigned images. 4. Upgrade kro: As soon as a patched version (≥0.2.1) is available, apply the update promptly to remediate the vulnerability. 5. Network segmentation: Isolate Kubernetes cluster nodes and restrict network access to minimize the impact of potential node compromise. 6. Implement runtime security: Use container runtime security tools to detect and prevent anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation. 7. Incident response readiness: Prepare for potential exploitation by having incident response plans tailored to Kubernetes environments, including node isolation and forensic capabilities.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland
CVE-2025-48710: CWE-441: Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy') in kro.run kro
Description
kro (Kube Resource Orchestrator) 0.1.0 before 0.2.1 allows users (with permission to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources) to supply arbitrary container images. This can lead to a confused-deputy scenario where kro's controllers deploy and run attacker-controlled images, resulting in unauthenticated remote code execution on cluster nodes.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-48710 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting kro (Kube Resource Orchestrator) version 0.1.0, prior to 0.2.1. The vulnerability arises from a confused deputy scenario (CWE-441) where users with permissions to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources can supply arbitrary container images. Kro's controllers, which have elevated privileges, then deploy and run these attacker-controlled container images on cluster nodes. This results in unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) on the nodes hosting the Kubernetes clusters managed by kro. The vulnerability exploits the trust relationship between the user and the controller component, where the controller acts as a privileged intermediary. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 4.1, reflecting a network attack vector with low attack complexity but requiring high privileges (PR:H) and no user interaction. The scope is changed (S:C), indicating that the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. The impact is limited to integrity (I:L) with no direct confidentiality or availability impact. No known exploits are currently reported in the wild, and no patches have been linked yet. The vulnerability is significant because it allows an attacker with certain permissions to escalate their capabilities to execute arbitrary code on cluster nodes without authentication, potentially compromising the entire Kubernetes environment managed by kro. This can lead to further lateral movement, data manipulation, or persistent backdoors within the cluster infrastructure.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those leveraging Kubernetes orchestration platforms like kro, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized code execution on critical infrastructure nodes. Compromise of cluster nodes can lead to manipulation or disruption of containerized applications, data breaches, and loss of integrity in business-critical services. Given the increasing adoption of Kubernetes in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing across Europe, exploitation could disrupt operations and violate compliance requirements like GDPR if data integrity or availability is impacted indirectly. The requirement for high privileges to exploit somewhat limits the threat to insiders or compromised accounts, but insider threats or privilege escalation attacks could leverage this vulnerability to gain full control over cluster nodes. The lack of user interaction needed means automated exploitation is possible once privileges are obtained. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in supply chain attacks if attackers compromise users with the required permissions. Overall, the impact is moderate but with potential for significant operational disruption in sensitive environments.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Restrict permissions strictly: Limit the ability to create or modify ResourceGraphDefinition resources to only highly trusted administrators. Implement least privilege principles rigorously. 2. Monitor and audit: Continuously monitor Kubernetes audit logs for creation or modification of ResourceGraphDefinition resources and unexpected container image deployments. 3. Use admission controllers: Deploy Kubernetes admission controllers or policy engines (e.g., OPA Gatekeeper) to validate and restrict container images that can be used in ResourceGraphDefinition resources, blocking untrusted or unsigned images. 4. Upgrade kro: As soon as a patched version (≥0.2.1) is available, apply the update promptly to remediate the vulnerability. 5. Network segmentation: Isolate Kubernetes cluster nodes and restrict network access to minimize the impact of potential node compromise. 6. Implement runtime security: Use container runtime security tools to detect and prevent anomalous behavior indicative of exploitation. 7. Incident response readiness: Prepare for potential exploitation by having incident response plans tailored to Kubernetes environments, including node isolation and forensic capabilities.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2025-05-23T04:16:39.433Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 683fe089182aa0cae29f094d
Added to database: 6/4/2025, 5:58:33 AM
Last enriched: 7/5/2025, 6:24:35 PM
Last updated: 8/12/2025, 1:58:38 AM
Views: 19
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8933: Cross Site Scripting in 1000 Projects Sales Management System
MediumCVE-2025-8932: SQL Injection in 1000 Projects Sales Management System
MediumCVE-2025-8931: SQL Injection in code-projects Medical Store Management System
MediumCVE-2025-8930: SQL Injection in code-projects Medical Store Management System
MediumCVE-2025-50610: n/a
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.