Skip to main content
CVE-2025-49180VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-49180: X.Org xwayland · Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Affects X.Org xwaylandSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.8 High.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
7.8High
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 17 Jun 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

What to do

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Red Hatredhat/xwaylandpkg:rpm/redhat/xwaylandOther threatsAffected
  • =0
Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Red Hat has released official security updates addressing CVE-2025-49180 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 and 9.4. Users should apply the provided patches from the Red Hat advisories RHSA-2025:10258 and RHSA-2025:10342 promptly to remediate this vulnerability. Detailed update instructions are available in the Red Hat knowledge base article https://access.redhat.com/articles/11258. No additional mitigation steps are indicated beyond applying these official fixes.

Description

A flaw was found in the RandR extension, where the RRChangeProviderProperty function does not properly validate input. This issue leads to an integer overflow when computing the total size to allocate.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…